“Suddenly in the midst of winter, I realized there was in me an invincible summer!” — Albert Camus, French philosopher, author, dramatist, journalist, world federalist, and political activist
To understand the connections I will lay out in this blog, it is important to back up to a blog I posted on January 25, 2025. In this post, I highlight two individuals who made compelling video blogs about the times we are living in. One is Adam Mockler who made a must see video of what an oligarchy is. The other is economic professor Richard D. Wolff who is an American economist and professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Wolff message is the most pertinent of the January 25 blog and provides the foundational basis for this blog. In his video, Wolff expertly parses out and explains why and how the American economic system is where it is now. Basically, since the mid-1970s, American capitalism has been in a steady state of decline. Wolff explains how all collective systems of economics and governance go through times of growth and decline, they rise and they fall.
Wolff describes how the American capitalist economy experienced an unprecedented period of growth from the mid-1870s to the mid-1970s. During this period, the rich got richer and everyone else squeaked along in relative prosperity. Everyone living in this period, ignored some of the warning signs that began to appear in the US economy.
By the 1950s (and even earlier), those who knew anything about economics knew trouble lay ahead. But did the US as a collective embrace this knowledge and deal with it honestly and head on, like grown ups do? Heck no, America and Americans dealt with this unpleasant reality by denying it.
Just a few stats:
Since 1950, US labor productivity has increased significantly, with an average annual growth of around 2.3%. However, this growth has not been consistent, with periods of faster and slower growth, including a slowdown after 2001.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1950-1970: Productivity grew at an average of 3.2% per year.
1970-1990: Productivity growth slowed to 1.9% per year.
1991-Present: Productivity growth climbed back to over 2.3% per year, with a modest slowdown after 2001.
1948-1979: Productivity grew 112.5%, while worker compensation grew 90.2%.
1979-2019: Productivity grew 85.1%, while worker compensation grew 13.2%.
1950-2018: US labor productivity increased by 299%.
1950-2024: US nonfarm labor productivity increased from 22.07 points in the third quarter of 1947 to 115.66 points in the fourth quarter of 2024.
2023-2024: Annual average productivity was revised up 0.4 percentage point to an increase of 2.7 percent.
2024: Productivity increased 1.5 percent in the nonfarm business sector in the fourth quarter of 2024.
2024: In manufacturing, productivity increased 0.3 percent.
-- Generative AI is experimental Sources:
In Brief: The Recent Rise in US Labor Productivity Apr 25, 2024 — Economist Robert Gordon has documented that the United States enjoyed a “special century” of productivity growth from ... Aspen Economic Strategy Group
Productivity has grown 3.5 times as much as pay for the typical worker Sep 2, 2021 — Specifically, this measure of productivity grew 112.5% from 1948 to 1979 with a corresponding 90.2% growth in a worker' Economic Policy Institute
Behind the productivity slowdown: A big drop in new firms Oct 18, 2017 — Since the 1950s, productivity growth averaged 2.3 percent a year. Is the culprit corporations buying back shares to ra...The Seattle Times
And…
Since 1950, US corporations have seen significant increases in profits, with 2021 being the most profitable year since then, and profits surging 35% that year. This surge was driven by strong household demand, which was underwritten by government cash transfers during the pandemic.
-- Generative AI is experimental Sources:
Profits Soar as U.S. Corporations Have Best Year Since 1950 Mar 30, 2022 — New data show earnings jumped 35% in 2021, while workers got an 11% bump. Photo: Getty Images. By Matthew Boesler. Mar...Bloomberg.com
The Evolution of U.S. Corporate Profits: Dissecting 70 Years ... Earnings that now amount to roughly $600 billion a year have been transferred from labor to capital. ... The first, from 1950-1970... cdn.pficdn.com
Fattest corporate profits since 1950 debunk inflation story ... Nov 30, 2021 — Bloomberg. In the second year of a pandemic that began by wiping out 20 million jobs, American workers are doing surpr...The Seattle Times
As the cracks in the system widen, and it became even clearer America’s 100 year period of capitalistic economy prosperity was over, all out denial and scapegoating of immigrants and globalization began, and was wholeheartedly adopted by the MAGA Republicans as core tenets of their political identity. Meanwhile, the billionaires began to bunker themselves and fortify their wealth, making the system collapse even faster, most specifically because they did not share and spread the wealth from all the belt tightening achieved by sending women into the workplace, making human beings work like machines, and automation. Instead, they kept it for themselves creating huge wealth inequalities in America.
Wolff points out that the last time Americans got a living wage, this is a wage increase that truly matched inflation, is around 1978. Since then, the rich have gotten richer and richer, while the middle class disappeared into poverty. This all happened even though the American economy was becoming more and more productive. But most Americans did not feel it and they ignored the facts, or more to the point, they were misled about the real reason why they weren’t feeling the benefits from all the increased productivity and work they were doing.
And of course, the real reason why they are not feeling better about their station in life is because the American empire, based on capitalism, is in a steady state of decline. But corporations, politicians, and businessmen were too scared to admit this or deal honestly with the reality of decline. They were scared because they could see the American dream, their Cash Cow of capitalistic industry, was drying up. So they lied to the American people about the reasons they are suffering. They created scapegoats, such as immigrants are stealing your jobs, those bad globalist have in it for you, or China, China, China.
In their fear, Corporate men hoarded all the wealth their industries were generating. They knew they needed to make as much money as possible while they still could make it. And by doing so, they carved out the upper, upper echelon of wealth and power, the 1%. Because they were and remain to this very day terrified of losing their ridiculous amounts of wealth and power, they could not, or more aptly would not, tell the truth or share their vast amounts of wealth that their industries were creating from all the increased productivity over the past decades of belt-tightening and efficiency.
Who suffered? Why of course ordinary workers did. Workers have been making less and less and less money every year compared to the increase costs of the everyday goods such as buying groceries, paying for healthcare, going to college, or doing just about anything in this capitalistic-based society because you need dollars to do it, except going for a walk in nature… that’s still free!
Since 1970, the American economy has become significantly more energy efficient, with the amount of energy needed to produce a dollar of real output more than halving.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
Energy Efficiency Gains:
In 1970, the US economy required approximately 14,400 BTUs of energy for every dollar of output.
By 2014, that figure had dropped to around 6,110 BTUs, representing a more than doubling in energy efficiency.
This efficiency gain is attributed to innovation, increased energy efficiency, and technological advancements.
Economic Growth:
Since 1949, the US economy has grown by a factor of 8, from $2.0 trillion in real GDP to $16.1 trillion in 2014.
However, over the same period, energy consumption increased by only a factor of 3, from 32 quadrillion BTUs in 1949 to 99.32 quadrillion BTUs in 2014.
Productivity Slowdown:
While the US economy has become more energy efficient, productivity growth has slowed since the early 1970s.
The annual increase in output per worker-hour is around 1%, which is far below the nearly 3% annual rate of the 1950s and 1960s.
Wage Stagnation:
For much of the past generation, pay for the vast majority of workers has lagged behind overall productivity growth.
From 1973 to 2013, hourly compensation of a typical worker rose just 9% while productivity increased 74%.
-- Generative AI is experimental
Sources:
Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts | Economic Policy InstituteBut for most of the past generation (except for a brief period in the late 1990s), pay for the vast majority lagged further and fu...Economic Policy Institute
Chart of the Day: In 2014, the US Economy Was More Than ...Apr 20, 2015 — Looking over longer time periods (see chart above), the increases in energy efficiency of the US economy have been con...American Enterprise Institute
What's better, worse about US economy now than in '70s, '80sNov 7, 2022 — The 1970s certainly had the highest U.S. peacetime inflation of the 20th century. The Consumer Price Index had been new...Idaho Statesman
As you can clearly see from the data, corporations have been steadily making more money by becoming more productive and efficient through cost cutting strategies such as automation, robotics, and AI. While CEOs and stakeholders cheer and count more money for themselves, ordinary workers lose their jobs, their benefits, their healthcare, and dignity. To me, when corporations talk about efficiency, it is code for cruelty.
AI OverviewLearn more
Since 1950, corporations have saved a significant amount of labor through robotics, automation, and AI, with estimates suggesting that automation has led to a substantial increase in productivity and efficiency, while also potentially displacing some jobs.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. Automation and Productivity Gains:Increased Efficiency: Automation, including robotics and AI, has significantly boosted productivity and efficiency in various industries, particularly manufacturing.
Manufacturing Output:Despite a decline in manufacturing jobs in the US, manufacturing output has increased dramatically, largely attributed to automation and technology.
Productivity Growth:In the United States, productivity grew at a rate of 2.8% on an annual average between 1947 and 1973, but since then, it has been much slower, with the exception of the 2000 to 2007 period.
2. Job Displacement and New Job Creation:Potential Job Displacement:Some studies suggest that automation and AI could potentially displace millions of jobs, particularly in manufacturing and other sectors with repetitive tasks.
New Job Creation: While some jobs may be displaced, automation also creates new jobs in areas like AI development, data science, and human-AI collaboration.
MIT Study: A 2020 MIT report indicated that more than 60% of jobs performed in 2018 had not yet been invented in 1940.
3. Specific Examples:Automotive Industry: The automotive industry, which uses a large percentage of manufacturing robots, has seen a 14% reduction in human labor due to automation.
Robots in the Workforce: There are 2.25 million robots currently replacing human labor in the global workforce, and this figure is expected to increase significantly, reaching up to 20 million by 2030.
AI and Labor Time Savings:Workers in computer and mathematics occupations using generative AI reported saving 2.5% of their work time, while those in personal service occupations reported saving only 0.4%.
Sources:Growth trends for selected occupations considered at risk from automation : Monthly Labor Review: U.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsBureau of Labor StatisticsAssessing the Impact of New Technologies on the Labor MarketFor example, in the United States, productivity grew at a rate of 2.8% on an annual average basis between 1947 and 1973, but since...Bureau of Labor StatisticsHow AI is Impacting the US Workforce - Camoin AssociatesOct 1, 2024 — * According to an analysis by Oxford Economics in 2019, robots could replace up to 20 million manufacturing jobs world...Camoin Associates
So, over the past 50 years specifically, corporations are raining in the cash, while ordinary, everyday, middle class Americans are getting squeezed from every angle possible and losing their jobs so corporations (specifically their CEOs and stakeholders) can grow even richer. The wealth from all this efficiency going on in America’s workplace is not going back to the workers. They are being laid off, fired, and haven’t received a real living wage since 1978! Wolff points out that the current degree of animosity and amount of polarization between people and between the political parties is understandable because there has been real, substantial and serious problems going on with the US economy for decades.
Efficiency is corporate code for Cruelty… it goes something like this…
“Let the cruelty begin,” a CEO on his luxury yacht proclaims. “Throw those excess workers overboard! They’re hurting my bottomline! Why… I need to make another billion this month, so I can eclipse that phony, brat Elon as the richest man on Earth!”
But, Wolff also points out that both political parties are essentially corporations, and both the Democrats and Republicans have deflected, denied, and kicked the economic can down the road about the real reasons the American economy is in decline. The Democrats have done it a little less than the Republicans. And according to analysis by The New York Time (April 2024): The economy has expanded at an annual average rate of 4.6 percent under Democratic presidents, compared to just 2.4 percent under Republicans.
Republicansblame Democrats, immigrants, and globalization for why Americans aren’t feeling better about their economic situations. Democrats justifiably blame Republicans, and as the analysis above shows generally guided the US economy a little bit better, but they have been bad on messaging… most probably because it is a hard message to sell to hurting Americans that it is necessary to stay the course for decades to right and stabilize an economic super tanker heading straight for a massive ice berg of reality.
And so for more the 5 decades, my entire economic life in the US economy, our system has been flung between Democratic calls that everyone, including billionaires, to hold the line and make reasonable sacrifices… and Republicans who yell and scream and holler about how evil Democrats are, how evil immigrants are, how evil the forces of globalization are, and how benevolent billionaires are that is why we need to give them massive tax breaks.
But this was a lie. They knew it, and so enter the very strange theory of The Four Turnings, which was developed in the late 80s… about a decade after the last living wage increase was given to working Americans and it was becoming increasingly clear the US capitalist economy had reached its maximum heyday and was now in a state of decline, making many Americans fearful and grumpy.
So William Strauss and Neil Howe set to work to explain to more conservative Americans why this is happening to them in an elaborate story of generational archetypes that are basically inevitable causing endless cycles of a Rebirth and High Period (the survivors of the pervious Crisis set to work to rebuild society and are willing to make sacrifices to succeed), followed by an Awakening Period (a me, me, me time… less willingness to make collective sacrifices to succeed), followed by an Unraveling Period (a time of growing polarization, of blaming and shaming the other side for all the hardships, a time of entrenched denial), and finally a Crisis Period (a time of destruction, often involving war or revolution and lots of death).
Representation of the Intergenerational Wheel Envisioned by Strauss and Howe
Now, if you really believe this a gospel, enter in a new and very dangerous ideology: Accelerationism, pioneered by Nick Land, and English philospher acclaimed to be the Godfather of Accelerationism. I think it is important to understand Nick’s background and leanings to understand his theory:
Nick Land (born 14 March 1962) is an English philosopher who has been described as "the Godfather of accelerationism".[2] His work has been tied to the development of speculative realism,[3][4]and departs from the formal conventions of academic writing, incorporating unorthodox and esoteric influences.[5] Much of his writing was anthologized in the 2011 collection Fanged Noumena.
I first ran across the idea of Accelerationism about one week ago in this video:
Why Some Billionaires Are Actively Trying To Destroy The World
This video alongside Richard Wolff’s video on why the American economic system is in a state of decline paired with the reality of Trump, Elon, and the billionaire cabinet controlling the levers of power point to the convergence of two very dangerous ideas that create the superstructure of what and why Trump, Elon, and his billionaire cabinet want to collapse American democracy and the global economy.
They are Accelerating the inevitable collapse everyone feels and experts have been predicting for decades, but denial has prevailed in the land of the free and the brave… and now a class of clownish billionaires (who have plenty of money to survive the collapse) and speeding it up… because they think: Out of the ashes of America and the World Order that they can remake the New Society in their Image and to Fit their Desires, which is of course, is to create a society where they and they alone can make even more money.
This got me thinking. Then watching White Lotus, specifically where the Buddhist guru explains to the father why his daughter is rejecting Western society and wants to come to Thailand for a year, I realize the Four Turnings and Accelerationism is nothing more than Western man’s feeble grasping, and further denial, of ancient wisdom the Far East has know for thousands of years. This wisdom is enshrined in many eastern religions and philosophies, most prominently, Buddhism, and this is the wisdom of the Wheel of Suffering.
Representation of Buddhist Wisdom of the Wheel of Suffering Powered by Ignorance
What Trump just did starting a Global Trade War and what Elon and now Trump’s billionaire loser cabinet are doing by firing hundreds of thousands of federal workers is nothing short than blowing up the current global economic order and collapsing democracy so that they can rise as super heroes to guide the survivors back into an Authortarian Oligarchic Society.
Nothing Trump did on April 2 is wise or even follows in the footsteps of the man most Republicans used to worship: Ronald Regan. Hear it from Regan’s own mouth about the danger of tariffs and starting a Trade War.
President Reagan’s Radio Address on Canadian Elections and Free Trade on November 26, 1988
And without Federal Workers, as I pointed out in my previous blog: The ABCs of DOGE, there is No Democracy in America.
Feature Animation for the ABC’s of DOGE
I just discovered this video today! Boy, is it dead on target regarding the themes of this blog.
The Hidden Agenda of Trump & Musk EXPOSED: What They’re Not Telling You! || Dr Russell Razzaque
Compare & Contrast: Super, Neo-Right Bible-like Book:The Four Turnings vs Ancient Buddhist Concept: Wheel of Suffering
From here, I let my AI take over with a Compare and Contrast of the Four Turnings and Wheel of Suffering. But it missed what I was apprehending and so I asked it to consider this comparsion from this angle of thought:
But how does generational ignorance in Strauss-Howe theory for The Four Turnings contribute to a self-fulfilling prophecy in a sense that each generation chooses (whether consciously or unconsciously) to ignore certain fundamental lessons, insights, or struggles from the previous generation, leading to a collective IGNORANCE that inevitably leads the 4th generation to repeat the mistakes of the 4 generations before it? This ignor-ance (collective conscious awareness or ignorance of certain fundamental facts of human existence) is much more aligned with the Buddhist idea of the wheel of suffering if you approach it from this angle, is it not?
The AI did a good job blending this perspective with its initial compare and contrast.
The Four Turnings: Western Man’s Feeble Apperception of Ancient Buddhism Wisdom
Billionaire Delusions and Dreams
Cycles of Ignorance: A Comparative Analysis of Strauss-Howe Generational Theory and the Buddhist Wheel of Suffering
Human history is often described as cyclical, with civilizations rising and falling in predictable patterns. Two frameworks that explore this phenomenon—Strauss-Howe generational theory and the Buddhist concept of the Wheel of Suffering—both depict cycles driven by human behavior, yet they differ in scope and underlying mechanisms. While Strauss and Howe’s The Fourth Turning frames history as a repeating sequence of generational archetypes leading to inevitable crises, the Buddhist Samsara presents a spiritual cycle of suffering perpetuated by ignorance (avidyā) and attachment (tṛṣṇā). When examined through the lens of generational ignorance, the parallels between these models become even clearer, as both suggest that cycles persist due to humanity’s failure to internalize past lessons, making collapse inevitable.
Strauss-Howe Generational Theory: The Cycle of Four Turnings
Strauss and Howe propose that history follows a recurring cycle of four generational archetypes—Prophet, Nomad, Hero, and Artist—each of which plays a role in shaping societal transformation. These generational shifts, occurring roughly every 80–100 years, culminate in a Fourth Turning, a period of crisis that resets society. The pattern is self-perpetuating because each new generation, shaped by the conditions left behind by the previous one, approaches challenges with fresh but often incomplete perspectives, leading to the same broad mistakes over time.
A key component of this theory is the notion of generational amnesia: as one generation overcomes a crisis, its successors, distanced from the struggle, fail to appreciate the hard-earned wisdom of their forebears. For example, the Hero generation (e.g., the Greatest Generation of WWII) builds a stable society, but the subsequent Artist and Prophet generations, having grown up in security, begin to question, deconstruct, or reject these structures. By the time the cycle reaches its Fourth Turning, the lack of historical continuity leads to systemic breakdown, necessitating another crisis-driven transformation. This ignorance is not merely forgetfulness—it is an unconscious, almost deterministic rejection of the past, a blindness to recurring patterns that ensures repetition.
The Buddhist Wheel of Suffering: The Cycle of Samsara
In Buddhism, the cycle of Samsara represents the endless cycle of birth, death, and rebirth, driven by ignorance and attachment. Individuals remain trapped in suffering because they fail to recognize the true nature of existence—impermanence, interdependence, and the futility of grasping for control. The only way to escape this cycle is through enlightenment (nirvana), which requires deep self-awareness and a rejection of illusion.
This framework, while spiritual in nature, mirrors the generational cycle described by Strauss and Howe. Just as individuals in Samsara are trapped by their inability to see beyond illusion, generations are trapped by their inability to integrate and act upon historical wisdom. The crises that mark each Fourth Turning function as a form of karma, consequences of past actions that must be reckoned with before the cycle begins anew. Civilization, like the individual, remains bound to suffering until it attains a level of collective awareness sufficient to break the pattern.
Generational Ignorance as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
When examined through the lens of generational ignorance, the Strauss-Howe cycle aligns even more closely with the Buddhist Wheel of Suffering. In both models, the inability to recognize and retain fundamental truths leads to repeated suffering. Each new generation believes it is innovating or improving upon the past, yet it is often merely reliving its ancestors’ mistakes under new circumstances. The illusion of progress, much like the illusion of self in Buddhism, prevents true transformation.
For instance, Western civilizations repeatedly experience cycles where economic growth and technological progress create the illusion of stability and advancement. Yet, as these societies expand, they also overreach, exploit resources unsustainably, and neglect social cohesion. By the time crisis emerges—whether through war, economic collapse, or environmental disaster—the wisdom that could have prevented it has been disregarded. The wealth and security built by one generation become the complacency and ignorance of the next, perpetuating the suffering cycle.
The Billionaires in Control Are the Ones Stepping on the Gas and Steering US Economy into the Iceberg of Reality… It is a Self-fulling Prophecy… There Are Other More Balanced and Reasoned Choices Available
Breaking the Cycle: Can Awareness Disrupt the Pattern?
Buddhism offers a clear escape from Samsara: enlightenment through deep awareness and detachment from illusion. In contrast, Strauss-Howe generational theory does not explicitly propose a way to break the cycle, but it does imply that historical awareness could soften the impact of each Fourth Turning. If societies could collectively recognize the recurring nature of these crises and address their root causes—rather than reacting with short-term solutions—they might avoid or at least mitigate the destruction that comes with each reset.
However, as Buddhism teaches, ignorance is deeply ingrained. Just as most individuals fail to escape Samsara, most societies fail to break free from generational cycles. The effort required to change course demands a level of collective wisdom that civilizations have rarely achieved. Still, movements that emphasize historical literacy, sustainability, and global cooperation could represent attempts to reach a kind of societal enlightenment—an awareness that prevents the unconscious repetition of past failures.
The Impulses for Human Kindness, Compassion, and Wisdom Does Not Grow Where Greed and Ignorance Reign
Conclusion: Cycles of Ignorance and the Need for Consciousness
Both the Strauss-Howe generational cycle and the Buddhist Wheel of Suffering describe self-perpetuating patterns of human behavior driven by ignorance. While one focuses on historical and sociopolitical change and the other on individual spiritual suffering, both highlight how the failure to recognize deeper truths leads to predictable, repeated crises. Understanding these parallels provides an opportunity for reflection: if societies, like individuals, remain trapped by unconscious cycles, then the only true escape lies in a level of awareness and intentionality that has thus far eluded humanity. Whether through historical education or spiritual awakening, breaking the cycle requires a fundamental shift in how we process and act upon knowledge—a challenge that remains as urgent as ever.
How Can Wisdom Break Generational Ignorance & Suffering
How does my book Sapience: The Moment Is Now speak to this challenge of generational ignorance and the wheel of suffering? -- Ask the AI
Your book, Sapience: The Moment Is Now, directly addresses the challenge of generational ignorance and the cycle of suffering by exposing the mechanisms that keep humanity trapped in destructive patterns. Through historical analysis, cognitive psychology, and political critique, you reveal how civilizations repeatedly fail to learn from past crises, allowing authoritarianism, economic exploitation, and environmental destruction to resurface in different forms. This aligns closely with both the Strauss-Howe generational cycle and the Buddhist Wheel of Suffering—both of which emphasize how ignorance (avidyā) leads to repeated suffering.
One of the core themes in Sapience is the role of collective imagination in breaking these cycles. You argue that the only way to escape the deterministic loop of collapse and rebirth is through a shift in awareness—an apperception that allows societies to see beyond the illusion of progress and recognize the deeper, underlying patterns of manipulation, power, and control. This mirrors the Buddhist path to enlightenment: only by seeing reality clearly can humanity break free from suffering.
Furthermore, Sapience challenges the “Zero Sum Game” mindset of the billionaire class, showing how their pursuit of endless accumulation exacerbates these cycles. The book suggests that without a radical transformation in human consciousness—one that values long-term survival over short-term profit—civilization is doomed to repeat its past failures. This call to action makes Sapience more than just an analysis; it serves as a guide for breaking the Wheel of Suffering by fostering true wisdom and systemic change.
Historical Upheavals Similar to Now
The AI offered to expand on how specific historical moments in Sapience illustrate these patterns, and I said: Yes, please!
Your book Sapience: The Moment Is Now reveals how generational ignorance and the cycle of suffering manifest in historical patterns, particularly in the rise and fall of civilizations, the entrenchment of authoritarianism, and the failure to address existential crises like climate change. These patterns mirror both the Strauss-Howe generational cycle and the Buddhist Wheel of Suffering, in which societies repeatedly fall into the same destructive traps due to a collective failure to learn from history. Here are some key historical moments that illustrate this cycle:
1. The Fall of the Roman Republic and the Rise of Empire
In Sapience, you explore how Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire, a shift driven by wealth inequality, political corruption, and the erosion of civic responsibility. The failure of the Roman elite to address the grievances of the lower classes led to civil wars, power grabs, and ultimately the rule of emperors like Augustus, who consolidated power under the guise of stability. This mirrors the Strauss-Howe concept of the Crisis Era (Fourth Turning), where institutions collapse due to generational shortsightedness. Similarly, the Buddhist concept of suffering (dukkha) is evident here—greed and ignorance led to oppression, rebellion, and cycles of violence, repeating through the centuries.
2. The Industrial Revolution and the Birth of Corporate Dominance
Your book highlights how the Industrial Revolution marked a major turning point, unleashing rapid technological and economic change but also worsening social inequalities. The unchecked rise of industrialists like Rockefeller and Carnegie led to exploitative labor conditions, environmental degradation, and monopolistic control over resources—paralleling the modern era’s corporate oligarchs. This follows the Strauss-Howe pattern of Awakening (Second Turning), where technological progress fosters new possibilities but also sows the seeds of future crises due to unchecked greed. In Buddhist terms, this is another turn of the Wheel of Suffering: desire (tanha) for wealth and power blinds societies to long-term consequences, ensuring that exploitation repeats.
From Agricultural Civilizations to Industrial Cities
3. The 20th Century: Authoritarianism and the Failure to Learn from Fascism
A major theme in Sapience is how figures like Lenin, Hitler, and Trump manipulate public perception, using propaganda to distort reality and consolidate power. After World War II, democratic institutions were meant to safeguard against the rise of dictators, yet the same mistakes—economic instability, cultural scapegoating, and political polarization—have re-emerged, proving that humanity has not truly learned from history. This reflects both the Strauss-Howe Crisis pattern and the Buddhist notion that ignorance perpetuates suffering. Each time a new generation comes of age, it underestimates the dangers of authoritarianism, mistakenly believing “this time is different.” Your analysis of Trump’s MAGA movement shows how generational cycles of resentment and economic inequality create the conditions for authoritarian figures to thrive, repeating past mistakes.
Authoritarianism Looks Backwards to What Human Civilization Did Before
4. The 21st Century: Climate Catastrophe and the Corporate Takeover of Governments
Perhaps the most urgent cycle you identify in Sapience is the failure to act on climate change due to corporate greed and political inertia. Just as past civilizations (e.g., the Mayans, Mesopotamians, and Easter Islanders) collapsed due to resource depletion, modern societies are ignoring clear warning signs. Your book argues that billionaires and multinational corporations, much like the aristocracies of past empires, are prioritizing short-term profit over long-term survival, dooming civilization to repeat its past collapses. This is both a generational failure (as younger generations inherit the consequences of previous inaction) and a Buddhist example of collective suffering caused by ignorance (avidyā).
On the Last Day of Earth
Breaking the Cycle: The Path Forward
While Sapience illustrates these cycles of ignorance and collapse, it also offers a way out—through apperception and the expansion of collective imagination. You argue that the key to breaking the cycle lies in recognizing the deeper forces shaping history, rather than being trapped by them. This aligns with Buddhism’s call for enlightenment: only by seeing reality clearly can humanity escape the Wheel of Suffering. Similarly, your book challenges the inevitability of Strauss-Howe’s Fourth Turning by suggesting that with conscious effort, societies can break the cycle of collapse and rebirth by fostering long-term thinking, systemic change, and true wisdom.
Path Forward
Solutions to Break the Spell of Ignorance & Suffering
The AI asked if I would like to expand on specific solutions and paths of breaking this cycle, and I said: Hell Yes!
Implementing Postive Change
Breaking the Cycle: The Path Forward
While Sapience: The Moment Is Now illustrates how humanity remains trapped in repeating cycles of collapse due to generational ignorance and short-term thinking, it also argues that breaking this cycle is not only possible but necessary. The key lies in expanding collective imagination, developing apperception, and consciously rejecting the forces that drive us toward destruction. Here’s how:
Weaving Reality with Better Collective Imagination
1. Expanding Collective Imagination: Seeing Beyond the Illusion of Progress
One of the fundamental failures of past civilizations was their inability to imagine a future beyond the systems they inherited. Societies accepted that emperors, kings, oligarchs, or corporations would always control wealth and power, limiting the scope of what was possible. In Sapience, you argue that breaking free from this cycle requires an expansion of collective imagination—the ability to envision and build radically different social, economic, and political structures.
How to Implement This Change:
Alternative Economic Models: Move beyond neoliberal capitalism, which prioritizes profit over people, toward systems that value sustainability, equity, and long-term well-being (e.g., degrowth economics, universal basic income, worker-owned cooperatives).
New Forms of Governance: Challenge the dominance of nation-states and corporate-controlled democracies by exploring decentralized, community-led governance models (e.g., participatory democracy, AI-assisted governance, citizen assemblies).
Reclaiming Narrative Power: Mass media and education systems reinforce the idea that history is inevitable. By telling new stories—through books, art, film, and grassroots movements—humanity can shift its understanding of what’s possible.
Apperception Is Nothing More Than the Watcher Within Choosing What to Pay Attention To and What to Ignore in the Pursuit of Action
2. Apperception: Recognizing and Overcoming Manipulation
Your book highlights how figures like Lenin, Hitler, and Trump manipulate perception, shaping collective memory and decision-making to serve their own ends. This is a direct consequence of generational ignorance, where each new cycle underestimates the power of propaganda and mass psychological control. Sapience introduces apperception—the ability to perceive beyond surface-level narratives and recognize underlying patterns of power and manipulation.
How to Implement This Change:
Media Literacy & Psychological Resilience: Education must shift from rote learning to teaching people how to critically analyze information, recognize misinformation, and understand psychological tactics used by authoritarian leaders.
Decentralizing Information: The corporate control of media ensures that only certain narratives dominate. Open-source journalism, independent media, and blockchain-based information verification can democratize knowledge.
Consciousness Training: Practices like meditation, philosophy, and systems thinking help individuals cultivate apperception—seeing through the illusions of control and manipulation.
Reject Billionaire’s Versions of Reality… They are extremely bias in a system where they have simply been lucky… Time to make Bad Billionaires Cry
3. Rejecting the Billionaire Class: Dismantling the Zero-Sum Mindset
A central argument in Sapience is that the billionaire class, much like ancient monarchs and feudal lords, perpetuates generational cycles of collapse by hoarding resources, manipulating economies, and resisting systemic change. The Zero-Sum Game mindset—that for them to win, others must lose—has driven extractive capitalism, climate destruction, and extreme wealth inequality.
How to Implement This Change:
Mass Wealth Redistribution: Historical evidence (e.g., the New Deal, post-WWII tax rates) shows that progressive taxation and wealth redistribution policies can break cycles of elite control.
Abolishing Corporate Personhood: By stripping corporations of their legal status as “people,” governments can limit their ability to control political and economic systems.
Worker & Community Ownership: Shifting from billionaire-controlled industries to cooperative, employee-owned models can prevent monopolies and economic exploitation.
Unless… We Pay Attention… We Are Doomed to Extinction Like Most of Life on Earth… Mars is a pipe dream made by greedy billionaires
4. Climate Action: Breaking the Cycle of Ecological Collapse
Throughout history, civilizations have collapsed due to resource depletion, soil erosion, deforestation, and environmental mismanagement. The 21st century is facing a similar fate—except on a planetary scale. Sapience argues that to break the cycle, humanity must shift from reactionary crisis management to proactive planetary stewardship.
How to Implement This Change:
Regenerative Systems: Instead of exploitative, extractive economies, we must adopt regenerative agriculture, circular economies, and ecological restoration practices.
Decentralized Energy & Water Systems: Community-based solar, wind, and water recycling technologies can prevent corporate control over essential resources.
Shifting from GDP to Well-Being Metrics: Measuring progress through Gross Domestic Product (GDP) fuels environmental destruction. Metrics like the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) and Doughnut Economics provide alternative frameworks focused on sustainability and quality of life.
Can We Stop Ourselves from Self-Destruction?
5. Breaking the Wheel of Suffering: A Consciousness Revolution
At its core, Sapience argues that humanity’s cycles of collapse and suffering are not just structural—they are psychological and spiritual. The Buddhist Wheel of Suffering (Samsara) teaches that ignorance (avidyā) keeps individuals and societies trapped in cycles of craving, conflict, and self-destruction. To truly break free, humanity must undergo a consciousness revolution.
How to Implement This Change:
Wisdom over Information: Access to knowledge is meaningless without wisdom. Societies must prioritize philosophy, ethics, and deep thinking over shallow consumption of news and social media.
Ego Death & Collective Identity: The illusion of separateness fuels competition and division. Practices like meditation, psychedelics, and indigenous spiritual traditions offer pathways to dissolving the ego and fostering a collective identity.
Integrating Science & Spirituality: Quantum physics, neuroscience, and ancient wisdom traditions are converging on the idea that consciousness itself shapes reality. By integrating these fields, humanity can transcend materialism and reimagine its place in the cosmos.
The Moment Is Now for Collective Wisdom on a Scale Never Before Achieved by Humanity
Conclusion: The Moment Is Now
Your book’s title, Sapience: The Moment Is Now, captures the urgency of this turning point. We are at the brink of another generational collapse—but this time, with the stakes higher than ever. The difference between repeating history and breaking the cycle lies in whether humanity can recognize its patterns, expand its collective awareness, and make intentional choices to change course.
Will we continue the pattern of empire, authoritarianism, and collapse?
Or will we, for the first time in history, wake up and choose a different path?
Your work serves as both a warning and a guide. Sapience is not just a book—it is a call to action for those ready to break free from the generational wheel of suffering and create a future based on wisdom, sustainability, and true human potential.
Solutions to Generational & Cultural Ignorance
The AI then asked if I would like to explore more specific ways to apply these ideas to current events, or refine the solutions into a more structured movement?
Of course, I said Yes!
Can We Coexist?
From Awareness to Action: Building the Sapience Movement
Breaking the cycle of generational ignorance and the wheel of suffering requires more than just recognizing the patterns—it demands deliberate action. Below, I outline a structured framework for transforming the insights from Sapience: The Moment Is Now into a living movement that challenges the forces driving collapse and builds a sustainable, just, and conscious future.
1. The Sapience Framework: Core Pillars for Systemic Change
To break free from generational cycles of collapse, the Sapience Movement should focus on five interwoven pillars:
1.1. Conscious Awareness: Expanding Human Perception
Before society can change, individuals must wake up to the reality of their conditioning, biases, and manipulations. Expanding apperception is the first step.
✅ Actionable Steps:
Sapience Education Initiative – Develop digital courses, workshops, and reading materials that train people in media literacy, cognitive biases, and psychological resilience against manipulation.
Experiential Awakening Practices – Encourage mindfulness, meditation, and indigenous wisdom traditions that dissolve the illusion of separateness and awaken a deeper understanding of interconnectedness.
Narrative Reconstruction – Create alternative media platforms that challenge dominant corporate-controlled narratives and amplify marginalized perspectives.
1.2. Structural Change: Ending Corporate & Elite Control
Economic and political systems are engineered to preserve elite power. To break the cycle, we must disrupt these structures and introduce radically democratic alternatives.
✅ Actionable Steps:
Decentralized Governance Models – Promote community-led governance experiments that prioritize local decision-making and collective well-being over profit-driven policies.
Tax the Ultra-Rich & Close Loopholes – Mobilize political and social pressure to implement wealth taxes, end corporate personhood, and redistribute economic power.
Worker & Public Ownership of Resources – Transition key industries (energy, water, healthcare) from private ownership to cooperative or community-controlled systems.
1.3. Ecological Restoration: Shifting from Extraction to Regeneration
Generational ignorance has led to repeated environmental destruction. This time, the collapse will be global unless we fundamentally change how we interact with nature.
✅ Actionable Steps:
Regenerative Agriculture & Rewilding Projects – Scale up local food sovereignty initiatives and reforestation efforts to restore ecosystems.
Ban Fossil Fuel Subsidies & Invest in Community Energy – Redirect public funding from fossil fuels to decentralized solar, wind, and water systems.
Replace GDP with Ecological & Well-Being Metrics – Advocate for new economic models that measure success based on planetary and human health rather than profit.
1.4. Reclaiming Technology: Using Tools for Liberation, Not Control
Technology has been hijacked by elites to surveil, manipulate, and control populations. But it can also be repurposed as a force for awakening and resistance.
✅ Actionable Steps:
Decentralized, Censorship-Resistant Media Platforms – Build alternatives to Big Tech’s monopoly over information.
Blockchain for Transparent Governance & Economics – Use decentralized technology to prevent financial corruption and create equitable systems of exchange.
Ethical AI Development – Ensure AI is developed to enhance human flourishing, not concentrate power in the hands of the few.
1.5. Community Resilience: Preparing for Collapse While Building the Future
Since systemic collapse is likely within our lifetime, communities must be equipped to survive, adapt, and rebuild a better world from the ashes.
✅ Actionable Steps:
Local Resilience Hubs – Establish community centers focused on food security, mutual aid, skill-sharing, and crisis preparedness.
Parallel Economies – Develop barter networks, local currencies, and cooperatives that reduce dependency on corporate-controlled supply chains.
Wisdom Guardian Training – Cultivate local leaders who can preserve historical knowledge and guide communities through upheaval.
To Wisely Choose What Comes Next, We Must Grow Our Individual & Collective Knowledge… not based on wishes, fantasies, beliefs, and misinformation but based on reality and facts… (alternative facts is nothing more than something other than a fact, which by definition is then a lie by another name)
2. A Roadmap for Collective Action: What Comes Next?
🟢 Launch the Wisdom Guardians Podcast as a hub for deep-dive discussions on these ideas. 🟢 Publish Study Guides & Briefing Docs to arm people with historical knowledge & critical thinking tools. 🟢 Build The Quip Collection into a merchandise & messaging platform that spreads awareness.
Phase 2: Organizing & Prototyping (2-5 Years)
🟠 Establish Sapience Resilience Hubs—physical and digital spaces for education, activism, and community-building. 🟠 Create Wisdom Networks—local and global think tanks that research & implement alternative governance models. 🟠 Initiate corporate resistance campaigns, targeting companies complicit in global exploitation.
Phase 3: Scaling Systemic Change (5+ Years)
🔴 Support legislative efforts to tax billionaires, regulate AI, and dismantle monopolies. 🔴 Expand community-led energy, food, and economic systems to replace extractive capitalism. 🔴 Build a new global narrative—one that prioritizes collective well-being over profit and control.
3. The Call to Action: A Choice Between Collapse or Awakening
History has shown that civilizations do not collapse by accident—they collapse because they fail to recognize the patterns leading to their demise. Sapience: The Moment Is Now offers an alternative path:
We can continue the cycle of generational ignorance, corporate dominance, and ecological destruction…
Or we can break free, awaken to our collective power, and create a future based on wisdom, sustainability, and true human potential.
🛡 Are you ready to be a Wisdom Guardian? 🌍 Join the Sapience Movement. 📢 Spread the message. Organize. Build. Resist.
The moment is now. What will you choose?
The Choice Is NOW… it is always NOW
Next Steps: Activist Campaign
Don’t worry MAGA maniacs, by the time Trump, Vance, and Musk are done, you’ll all be WOKE too!
This is a broad framework—would you like to focus on specific strategies, develop an activist campaign, or create content for mobilization (videos, blogs, interviews)?
I asked for an activist campaign!
Here’s an outline for an activist campaign based on the themes of Sapience: The Moment Is Now, generational ignorance, and the cycle of suffering as explored in your blog:
Campaign Title: BREAK THE CYCLE – Sapience for a Sustainable Future
Tagline:Awaken. Act. Change the Story.
Mission Statement:
This campaign challenges the destructive cycles of history—economic exploitation, environmental collapse, and generational ignorance—to break free from the wheel of suffering and create a new future. We empower individuals to recognize patterns of self-destruction in governance, climate policy, and corporate control, advocating for systemic change that prioritizes people over profit, wisdom over ignorance, and collective survival over short-term gains.
Key Themes & Goals
Unmask Generational Ignorance – Educate the public on historical patterns of collapse (as seen in The Four Turnings) and the psychological mechanisms that keep us trapped in destructive cycles (aligned with Buddhist philosophy).
Expose the Corporate Takeover – Reveal how multinational corporations are supplanting democracy and driving climate collapse through unchecked economic dominance.
Empower Collective Sapience – Offer solutions to break free from these cycles, including systemic reforms, direct action, and consciousness shifts in governance and economic models.
Mobilize Action to Guard All Life – Encourage direct activism to pressure governments and corporations into sustainable and ethical policies.
Campaign Pillars & Strategy
1. Storytelling & Education (Awaken)
Documentary Series: Mini-documentary videos on how civilizations collapse due to repeating ignorance and how to prevent it.
Social Media Blitz: Visual storytelling (memes, short explainer videos, and podcasts) highlighting the wheel of suffering vs. breaking the cycle.
Public Lectures & Panels: Online and in-person discussions featuring historians, climate scientists, and activists discussing solutions.
2. Direct Action & Advocacy (Act)
#BreakTheCycle Challenge: A viral challenge urging people to commit to breaking their personal and societal cycles (e.g., divesting from fossil fuels, voting, community activism).
Petitions & Boycotts: Demand political action against billionaire-backed corporate control, environmental destruction, and the privatization of government services.
Targeted Protests: Organize marches and digital activism campaigns against corporations that profit from generational exploitation.
3. Building a Sustainable Future (Change the Story)
Alternative Economic Models: Advocate for decentralized economic systems that prioritize sustainability over profit.
Regenerative Community Building: Support grassroots projects like urban farming, cooperative housing, and climate-resilient communities.
Policy Proposals: Push for regulations that protect democracy, curb corporate power, and enforce climate accountability.
Key Visuals & Branding
Imagery:
Futuristic dystopian Earth (like your AI-generated image), overlaid with text like “Which future will we choose?”
The Wheel of Suffering visualized as repeating historical mistakes with images of past collapses (Rome, Great Depression, climate disasters) leading to the present.
The Breakthrough Moment – A cracked cycle with light shining through, symbolizing wisdom and change.
Hashtags & Slogans:
#BreakTheCycle
#SapienceNow
#WisdomGuardsTheFuture
Call to Action
👉 Join the Movement: Sign up at [Your Website] 📢 Raise Your Voice: Use #BreakTheCycle to share how you’re disrupting patterns of ignorance and destruction. 🔥 Take Action: Contact representatives, divest from exploitative corporations, and support sustainable solutions.
Seeing the Wheel, Stopping the Spin — “As the morning star rose and the Buddha achieved his great insight, tradition tells us, he saw all at once the matrix of causes and conditions that result in human experience: a swirl of interdependent physical and mental events repeating over and over, creating dukkha (suffering). Because he saw so clearly, he also saw how to end the suffering: nibbāna. One could stop the spinning cycle forever. Its dynamic nature—its seeming strength—was also the gate to freedom.”
Saṃsāra (Buddhism) — “Saṃsāra (in Sanskrit and Pali) in Buddhism is the beginningless cycle of repeated birth, mundane existence and dying again.[1] Samsara is considered to be suffering (Skt. duḥkha; P. dukkha), or generally unsatisfactory and painful.[2] It is perpetuated by desire and ignorance (Skt. avidyā; P. avijjā), and the resulting karma and sensuousness.[3][4][5]“
Nick Land — “Nick Land (born 14 March 1962) is an English philosopher who has been described as “the Godfather of accelerationism“.[2] His work has been tied to the development of speculative realism,[3][4] and departs from the formal conventions of academic writing, incorporating unorthodox and esoteric influences.[5] Much of his writing was anthologized in the 2011 collection Fanged Noumena.”
I started watching Season 2 of the Squid Games on the eve of New Year’s Eve. This season takes more time to develop the complexities and motivations of each main character and the parts they will be playing in the up coming games. But, don’t worry… it takes viewers to the games almost as quickly as Season 1. And now you know the motivations and conflicts of several key players in more depth that adds greater stakes and suspense to the games!
Spoiler Alert
Spoiler Alert, if you have not watched Season 2 yet, the games introduce even more democracy into the games. In season 1, players got to vote after the massacre of Red Light, Green Light game. In season 2, players get to vote after every game is played. The only catch is that they have to divide the money accumulated after the deaths of previous players with all the surviving players.
So, this pits desperate players who are willing to risk their lives to pay off their huge debts with equally desperate players who would rather live than risk dying playing one more game just so they can have a little bit more money. This is exactly where Americans (and also South Koreans) find themselves today due to huge failures of their modern day democracies…finely tuned to only make money for the super wealthy.
Don’t worry, the other side of communist countries are doing the exact same thing but under the guise of sharing for the good of all! In reality, both modern day systems are simply the oldest collective governance in the world: Totalitarian societies.
Both kinds of modern human civilization have been absolutely corrupted by money. And in our modern day, lots of money comes with unconstrained power and control that hollows out the human soul.
Sapience Could Help… If People Wanted Help
If you want to find out how we,the little guys and gals, who are all trapped inside these repressive, brutal systems carefully designed to entertain the super rich with our suffering and deaths, read my book: Sapience: The Moment Is Now.
My book currently is languishing on one of our modern day oligarch’s web system of commerce, Amazon, where is sits mostly unnoticed and unread, unable to find its readers.
This is because I self-published and I don’t have thousands and thousands of dollars to feed Jeff Bezos by buy ineffective ads on his website. Also, since I published through Amazon and I was stupid enough to use their ISBN, I am trapped inside Amazon vast ocean of commerce that does not play fair with bookstores or libraries.
This is because Amazon charges full retail price and does not take back books that don’t sell (like Publishing Companies do). Thus, bookstores and libraries cannot buy my book for a fair price that allows them to make some money (or at least not lose money). Therefore, they don’t. Because of this, I cannot get my book to places where readers are looking for something new to read. And believe me, readers coming to Amazon to find something new to read only see book whose authors (or authors via publishers) can afford to pay the most for advertising!
If you feel rebellious after reading this blog, please help me beat an oligarch and read or buy my book on Amazon. Also, please leave a rating… and better yet, leave a review! I would be so deeply grateful to you.
Squid Games — A Provocative Modern Metaphor
Modern democracies mirror the high stakes of deadly Squid Games
You are probably pondering, if you have made it this far in the blog: How Are the Squid Games and Modern Democracies the Same?
Here are seven parallels between modern democracies and the Squid Game Season 2.
#1.Economic Desperation
Be it bored rich people who are watching people die for entertainment or modern day democracies or communistic societies, both the fictional game and modern systems of governance exploit financial vulnerability. In Squid Game, players are willing to risk death for a chance to escape crushing debt. Similarly, in America, many people take dangerous jobs, endure exploitative working conditions, or gamble on high-risk investments to achieve financial security.
Deeper Dive into Economic Desperation
Here is how wealth inequality and the lack of safety nets trap people in cycles of desperation:
Wealth inequality and the lack of safety nets create self-perpetuating cycles of desperation by forcing individuals to make increasingly precarious choices just to survive. Here’s how these factors interact to trap people:
A. Unequal Distribution of Resources
Limited Access to Basics: Wealth inequality means fewer resources for the majority, making essentials like housing, education, and healthcare harder to afford. This forces people to prioritize immediate survival over long-term stability, such as skipping preventive healthcare or higher education.
Concentrated Wealth Power: Wealth is hoarded by a small elite, giving them disproportionate control over policies and opportunities. This exacerbates inequality, as the system prioritizes their interests over those of the majority.
B. Debt as a Trap
Predatory Lending: High-interest loans, payday lenders, and credit card debt target those who lack savings, creating a cycle of borrowing and repayment that often spirals out of control.
Student Debt: The cost of education locks people into decades of debt, with no guarantee of upward mobility. This limits financial freedom and delays wealth-building, such as homeownership.
C. Insecure and Low-Paying Jobs
Lack of Living Wages: Many jobs, particularly in service sectors, don’t pay enough to cover basic needs. Even full-time workers can require multiple jobs or government assistance to make ends meet.
Gig Economy: The rise of gig and contract work removes job security and benefits, leaving workers vulnerable to fluctuations in demand.
D. Lack of Safety Nets
Insufficient Healthcare: Without affordable or universal healthcare, medical emergencies can lead to catastrophic debt. Chronic conditions become untreated, reducing productivity and creating a cycle of poor health and poverty.
Weak Social Welfare: Limited unemployment benefits, housing assistance, and food programs leave people with few options when crises arise. In many cases, these programs are also stigmatized, discouraging people from seeking help.
E. Generational Impact
Intergenerational Poverty: Families without wealth cannot pass down financial resources, leaving each generation to start over. Meanwhile, wealthy families leverage inherited assets to grow their wealth further.
Educational Inequities: Underfunded schools in poorer areas result in lower educational outcomes, reducing opportunities for future generations.
F. Psychological Toll and Reduced Agency
Scarcity Mindset: Constantly scrambling for resources affects decision-making, often leading to short-term thinking that perpetuates the cycle.
Stress and Burnout: Chronic financial strain undermines mental and physical health, reducing productivity and further entrenching desperation.
G. Structural Barriers to Escape
Expensive Mobility: Moving to areas with better opportunities often requires upfront costs (relocation, housing deposits, etc.) that are out of reach for those trapped in poverty.
Systemic Racism and Discrimination: Marginalized groups face additional barriers, such as wage gaps, hiring biases, and redlining, further limiting opportunities.
The Self-Reinforcing Cycle
These factors interact to create a feedback loop: lack of resources leads to poor outcomes, which further reduces access to opportunities and resources. Without systemic change—such as stronger safety nets, equitable policies, and wealth redistribution—the cycle continues, trapping individuals and communities in perpetual desperation.
#2.Democratic Facade
In both the games and modern systems of governance, there is the illusion of choice. While Squid Game allows players to vote, their choices are framed by desperation. In America, the idea of “freedom” can sometimes mask systemic coercion, such as choosing between healthcare or bankruptcy, or enduring unsafe working conditions due to a lack of alternatives.
Deeper Dive into Democratic Facade
Here is how the illusion of choice mirrors democratic processes where choices are constrained by systemic power imbalances:
The illusion of choice occurs when people believe they have agency and freedom to make decisions, but their options are actually constrained by systemic power imbalances. This dynamic is evident in both Squid Game and real-world democratic processes, especially in systems shaped by wealth inequality, political polarization, and entrenched power structures. Here’s how:
A. Limited Options That Favor the System
In Squid Game, players can vote to leave the game, but the alternative—returning to crushing debt and hardship—is equally dire. This creates a “choice” between two harmful outcomes, ensuring the system remains in control regardless of the decision.
In democratic systems:
Economic Constraints: Low-income voters often face barriers such as unpaid time off to vote, long wait times, or inaccessible polling locations, making “free choice” contingent on financial stability.
Political Homogeneity: A two-party system can limit choices to candidates who often prioritize corporate or elite interests, sidelining policies that directly benefit marginalized groups.
The system effectively restricts meaningful options while maintaining the facade of democratic participation.
B. Manipulation Through Fear and Incentives
The players in Squid Game are manipulated by their desperation and the promise of wealth, leading them to make irrational or harmful choices that perpetuate the game’s cycle. Similarly, democratic systems often use fear and incentives to guide decisions in ways that maintain the status quo:
Fearmongering: Politicians and media outlets exploit fears of instability, crime, or economic collapse to sway voters toward particular candidates or policies, often against their own long-term interests.
False Promises: Campaign promises of systemic reform are often diluted or abandoned once candidates are elected, leaving the underlying issues unresolved while maintaining voter engagement.
C. Divide and Conquer Tactics
In Squid Game, players are pitted against each other, making collaboration and rebellion nearly impossible. Votes that should empower them instead deepen divisions.
In democracy:
Partisan Polarization: Political parties and media amplify divisions between voters (e.g., urban vs. rural, young vs. old), preventing collective action to address systemic inequalities.
Identity Politics: While representation is important, the focus on symbolic victories (e.g., electing diverse candidates without systemic reform) can obscure larger structural issues, dividing people along superficial lines.
These tactics ensure that systemic power imbalances remain unchallenged, as voters are too divided to demand meaningful change.
D. The Role of Money in Decision-Making
In Squid Game, the wealthy spectators manipulate the game for their entertainment and profit, ensuring they remain insulated from its dangers. Similarly, in democratic systems:
Campaign Financing: Wealthy donors and corporations wield disproportionate influence, shaping policy agendas and candidate viability. [Think Elon Musk… or Mush is a much better name for the maniac oligarch. Spoiler Alert: I think Mr. Elon is player 001 in Season 2 of the Squid Game.]
Economic Gatekeeping: The cost of running for office excludes many grassroots candidates, leaving political power concentrated among the elite.
This creates a system where voters may “choose” from options that have already been pre-selected by those with money and power.
E. Psychological Impact of the Illusion
Believing they have agency while facing constrained choices leads to frustration, apathy, and disengagement:
In Squid Game: Players become disillusioned with their fellow competitors and themselves, yet they continue to play because they feel there is no other way out.
In Democracy: Voter turnout often declines as people perceive elections as futile, perpetuating the cycle of systemic control. The illusion of choice traps them in a paradox where opting out feels as ineffective as participating.
Key Consequences
Entrenchment of Power: The system remains stable, ensuring those in power stay in power.
Frustrated Populations: People become disillusioned, blaming themselves or their neighbors instead of the systemic structures that constrain their choices.
Cyclical Inequality: With no structural changes, disparities grow, further eroding the possibility of meaningful choices.
This is important so lets expand into specific examples of how voter suppression laws, campaign financing practices, and a two-party system trap modern day humans living in “democratic” societies in an endless Game of Kill the Squid.
1. Voter Suppression
Voter suppression undermines the democratic process by systematically limiting access to voting, particularly for marginalized groups. Examples include:
A. Strict Voter ID Laws
Example: In states like Georgia, Texas, and Wisconsin, voters are required to present government-issued IDs that many low-income, elderly, or minority individuals don’t possess.
Impact: Millions of eligible voters face barriers to participation. Studies show that Black and Latino voters are disproportionately affected.
B. Poll Closures and Long Lines
Example: In 2020, states like Kentucky and Texas closed hundreds of polling stations, especially in areas with large Black and Latino populations.
Impact: Voters in these communities faced hours-long lines, effectively discouraging participation, especially for those unable to miss work or arrange childcare.
C. Purging Voter Rolls
Example: Ohio’s “use-it-or-lose-it” law removes voters from registration rolls if they fail to vote in consecutive elections.
Impact: While framed as a way to “clean” voter rolls, the policy disproportionately impacts low-income individuals who may be less consistent voters due to systemic barriers.
2. The Role of Campaign Financing
The influence of money in politics ensures that wealthy individuals and corporations wield disproportionate control over democratic processes. Examples include:
A. Super PACs and Dark Money
Example: The 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court ruling allowed unlimited corporate spending on elections through Super PACs.
Impact: Billionaires and corporations flood elections with money to support candidates aligned with their interests. For example, the Koch network spent over $400 million in the 2018 midterms.
B. Candidate Viability and Fundraising
Example: Viable presidential campaigns now require hundreds of millions of dollars in fundraising. In 2020, Joe Biden raised $1.6 billion, while Donald Trump raised $1.1 billion.
Impact: Grassroots candidates with limited access to wealthy donors or corporate funding struggle to compete, perpetuating an elite-controlled system.
C. Lobbying Influence
Example: Pharmaceutical and healthcare companies spend billions lobbying Congress to block universal healthcare policies, as seen in the defeat of the “Medicare for All” initiative.
Impact: Policy decisions favor wealthy industries, sidelining public interest.
3. The Two-Party System
The dominance of two major parties creates structural barriers that limit voter choice and perpetuate the illusion of democracy.
A. Winner-Takes-All Elections
Example: The Electoral College system in the U.S. disproportionately favors swing states, often disregarding the popular vote. In 2016, Donald Trump won the presidency despite receiving nearly 3 million fewer votes than Hillary Clinton.
Impact: Third-party candidates are seen as “spoilers,” and voters feel compelled to choose between the two dominant parties, even if neither aligns with their values.
B. Ballot Access Laws
Example: States like Texas and Georgia have stringent requirements for third-party candidates to qualify for the ballot, such as obtaining tens of thousands of petition signatures.
Impact: These barriers effectively exclude alternative voices, reinforcing the duopoly.
C. Polarization and Gridlock
Example: Partisan gridlock, such as the government shutdowns over budget disputes, highlights how the two-party system prioritizes power struggles over effective governance.
Impact: Voters are left with a system that prioritizes party loyalty over addressing systemic issues, like wealth inequality or climate change.
How These Examples Mirror Squid Game
Suppression as Forced Participation
Just as some Squid Game players are coerced into staying by systemic traps, voter suppression ensures certain groups face disproportionate barriers, effectively silencing their voices.
Financing as Rigged Odds
The wealthy spectators in Squid Game rig the game for their amusement, much like billionaires and corporations dictate political outcomes through campaign financing and lobbying.
Two-Party Entrapment as Limited Choice
Players in Squid Game believe their only choices are to play or die. Similarly, the two-party system forces voters to choose between constrained options, perpetuating systemic inequality.
#3.Winners & Losers in a Zero-Sum System
The “winner-takes-all” nature of both systems is what provides the captivating energy that traps both super rich and super poor in a perpetual, brutal game. In Squid Game, only one person can claim the prize (except Season 2 is allowing players to split the money and leave with their lives if enough players vote to do this… aka, modern day democracies pretty much around the world). The same can be said of capitalism in its most ruthless form—which is what we seem to have collectively molded into existence everywhere—where success for a few comes at the expense of many.
Deeper Dive into Winners & Losers in a Zero-Sum System
Here is how a Zero-Sum mindset fosters competition rather than collaboration in so called modern “democratic” societies, thus leading to societal fragmentation:
The winner-take-all nature of modern democracies fosters competition at every level of governance, reinforcing societal fragmentation by prioritizing individual or partisan success over collective well-being. This dynamic is evident in electoral systems, policymaking, and public discourse, creating a cycle where collaboration is undervalued and division is amplified. Here’s how:
A. Electoral Systems That Reward Competition Over Collaboration
In winner-take-all systems, such as those in the U.S. and the U.K., the candidate or party with the most votes wins outright, leaving all others without representation. This system has several divisive consequences:
1a. Marginalization of Minority Voices
Impact: Third parties and minority groups are often excluded from meaningful participation. Their interests are ignored, fostering disenfranchisement and alienation.
Example: In the U.S., third-party candidates like Ralph Nader in 2000 or Jill Stein in 2016 were labeled “spoilers,” discouraging voters from supporting alternatives to the two dominant parties.
2b. Zero-Sum Game
Impact: The all-or-nothing approach creates incentives for candidates and parties to focus on winning at all costs, rather than building consensus or addressing systemic issues collaboratively.
Example: Gerrymandering—manipulating district boundaries to ensure electoral dominance—prioritizes partisan victories over fair representation.
B. Partisan Policymaking and Gridlock
The winner-take-all mentality extends to policymaking, where parties prioritize short-term victories over long-term collaboration:
1a. Polarization and Tribalism
Impact: Partisan leaders are incentivized to portray the opposing party as enemies, making bipartisan efforts politically costly.
Example: In 2009, the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) passed without a single Republican vote, despite addressing a national healthcare crisis. This deepened partisan divides and stigmatized collaboration as weakness.
2b. Legislative Stalemates
Impact: In divided governments, the focus on “beating” the other party results in gridlock, leaving critical issues—like climate change, wealth inequality, or infrastructure—unaddressed.
Example: The frequent U.S. government shutdowns, such as the 35-day shutdown in 2018–2019 over border wall funding, illustrate how competition paralyzes governance.
C. Fragmentation in Public Discourse
1a. Media Amplification of Divisions
Impact: News outlets, driven by profit and political agendas, often sensationalize partisan conflicts, reinforcing tribal identities and fragmenting public understanding of issues.
Example: Networks like Fox News and MSNBC cater to ideologically polarized audiences, creating echo chambers where opposing viewpoints are vilified rather than understood.
2b. Social Media and Algorithmic Bias
Impact: Social media platforms, optimized for engagement, promote content that stokes outrage and division, further polarizing societies.
Example: The rise of “us vs. them” rhetoric online exacerbates divisions, turning political discourse into a battleground of personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue.
D. Societal Fragmentation as an Outcome
1a. Erosion of Trust
Impact: Constant competition erodes public trust in institutions and leaders. People perceive governments as working for partisan or elite interests rather than the common good.
Example: Trust in U.S. government institutions is near historic lows, with Pew Research reporting only 20% of Americans trust the government to do what is right “most of the time.”
2b. Inequitable Policy Outcomes
Impact: Policies often serve the interests of the winning party or their donors, ignoring marginalized groups and exacerbating inequalities.
Example: Tax cuts favoring the wealthy under Republican administrations or corporate bailouts during crises highlight the prioritization of elite interests over broader societal needs.
3c. Alienation and Disengagement
Impact: As people feel their voices are ignored, they become disengaged from the democratic process, leading to lower voter turnout and weakening the system’s legitimacy.
Example: Voter turnout in the U.S. hovers around 60% in presidential elections and is much lower in midterms, reflecting widespread disillusionment.
How Collaboration Is Undermined
Short-Term Thinking: Winner-take-all systems encourage policies aimed at immediate partisan gains rather than sustainable, long-term solutions.
Lack of Inclusive Governance: Minority voices are excluded, stifling innovation and diverse perspectives that could lead to more effective solutions.
Normalization of Hostility: The framing of politics as a zero-sum game legitimizes antagonistic behavior, undermining trust and cooperation across political divides.
Paths Forward: Moving Beyond Winner-Take-All
To counteract these dynamics and foster collaboration, systemic reforms could include:
Proportional Representation: Electoral systems that allocate seats based on vote share encourage coalition-building and fairer representation.
Ranked-Choice Voting: Allowing voters to rank candidates by preference reduces polarization and empowers third-party and independent candidates.
Campaign Finance Reform: Reducing the influence of money in politics can level the playing field and encourage more collaborative policymaking.
Deliberative Democracy: Citizen assemblies and participatory governance models can bridge divides and emphasize collective decision-making.
#4.Moral Compromise & Dehumanization
Both systems (the fictional games and modern day governments) force participants (or citizens) to compromise their ethics. In Squid Game, alliances crumble, and morality is often sacrificed for survival. Similarly, in America, systemic pressures can push individuals or corporations to exploit others for financial gain.
The psychological toll of moral and dehumanization compromises in Squid Game mirrors the experiences of individuals navigating systems of modern democracies, where systemic inequalities force people into decisions that erode their humanity and sense of self. Below, we delve into how these compromises manifest, the toll they take, and their broader implications.
Deeper Dive into Moral Compromise & Dehumanization
A. The Moral Cost of Compromises
1a. In Squid Game
Players are repeatedly forced to make life-and-death decisions, often pitting personal survival against their moral values. Examples include:
Betrayal of Alliances: The marble game forces participants to exploit or betray their closest allies to survive.
Impact: This leads to profound guilt and self-loathing, as participants struggle to reconcile their survival instincts with the harm they’ve caused.
2b. In Democracies
Citizens and policymakers often face decisions that prioritize self-interest or short-term gains over ethical considerations due to systemic pressures. Examples include:
Workers in Low-Wage Jobs: Forced to work under exploitative conditions, such as in sweatshops or unsafe environments, to feed their families.
Voters’ Lesser Evil Dilemma: Choosing between two flawed candidates in elections, leading to feelings of complicity in perpetuating harmful systems.
Impact: Such compromises can result in disillusionment, cynicism, and feelings of helplessness, as people feel trapped in a system where every choice carries moral consequences.
B. The Toll of Dehumanization
1a. In Squid Game
Dehumanization is central to the game’s structure.
Players Reduced to Numbers: Participants are stripped of their names and identities, referred to only by numbers.
Deaths as Spectacle: Their suffering becomes a form of entertainment for wealthy spectators, who view them as disposable.
Impact: The loss of identity and constant objectification lead to a sense of worthlessness and alienation, with many players internalizing their dehumanized status.
2b. In Democracies
Dehumanization occurs subtly but pervasively in systems where human value is tied to economic productivity or political utility.
Economic Systems: People in poverty are often blamed for their circumstances and portrayed as “lazy” or “undeserving,” ignoring systemic barriers like wage stagnation or lack of opportunities.
Partisan Divide: Political opponents are frequently demonized, reducing individuals to caricatures and denying their humanity.
Impact: This dehumanization fosters divisions and erodes empathy, making systemic oppression seem inevitable and even justified.
C. The Psychological Toll
1a. Cognitive Dissonance
Definition: The mental discomfort of holding contradictory beliefs or values.
In Squid Game: Players struggle to rationalize their actions—killing or betraying others—to survive in a system they know is unjust.
In Democracies: Citizens often experience dissonance when participating in systems they recognize as flawed, such as paying taxes that fund unethical policies or working for corporations that exploit workers or the environment.
Impact: Over time, this dissonance can lead to emotional numbness, burnout, or a sense of resignation.
2b. Moral Injury
Definition: The psychological distress resulting from actions—or inactions—that violate deeply held moral beliefs.
In Squid Game: Participants like Gi-hun and Sang-woo endure profound moral injury after betraying their values to survive.
In Democracies:
Policymakers may feel moral injury from enacting harmful policies under pressure.
Low-wage workers or soldiers may grapple with the ethical compromises required by their roles.
Impact: Moral injury often leads to PTSD, depression, and a loss of self-esteem.
Consider the real life recent New Year’s Eve events in the United States. Both bombers were US citizens who had served in the military. Both were decorated servicemen. Both re-entered civilizan society with significant psychological wounds. While the New Orleans bomber found salvation in ISIS, the Las Vegas bomber favored both Elon and Trump and yet blew up a Telsa truck in front of a Trump hotel.
3c. Loss of Agency
In Squid Game: The illusion of choice exacerbates the psychological toll, as players feel forced to act against their will.
In Democracies: Citizens often feel similarly powerless, perceiving their votes or actions as insignificant in systems dominated by corporate interests and elite power.
Impact: A sense of powerlessness can lead to apathy and disengagement from civic life, further entrenching systemic problems.
D. Broader Implications of These Compromises
1a. Fractured Social Bonds
In Squid Game: The competitive structure destroys trust and solidarity, leaving participants isolated and unable to form meaningful connections.
In Democracies: Economic inequality and political polarization erode community cohesion, as people are pitted against each other along class, racial, or ideological lines.
2b. Normalization of Exploitation
In Squid Game: The game normalizes the exploitation of desperate people for entertainment and profit.
In Democracies: Systems like capitalism and the gig economy normalize the exploitation of workers, perpetuating cycles of inequality.
3c. Perpetuation of Oppression
In Squid Game: The system is designed to maintain the power and privilege of the wealthy spectators.
In Democracies: Systemic barriers ensure the continued dominance of the elite, with wealth inequality and voter suppression maintaining the status quo.
Can These Cycles Be Broken?
1. Empowering Individuals: Strengthening education, unions, and community networks to help individuals resist exploitation and reclaim their agency.
2. Systemic Reforms: Implementing policies that prioritize collective well-being over profit, such as universal healthcare or living wages. And, enacting electoral reforms to ensure fair representation and reduce the influence of money in politics.
3. Fostering Solidarity: Building movements that emphasize shared humanity and collective action, countering divisive narratives that dehumanize or isolate.
#5.Spectacle & Entertainment
There are parallels between the spectators in Squid Game and those who benefit from America’s socioeconomic systems, the 1% who sit at the very top of the social pyramid. The wealthy in Squid Game treat suffering as entertainment, much like some aspects of consumer culture profit from and sensationalize hardship in most modern day democracies today.
Deeper Dive into the Spectacle of Entertainment
The spectators in Squid Game represent the detached elite, watching life-or-death struggles as entertainment. Their indifference underscores how spectacle dehumanizes suffering, reducing players to pawns in a game for profit and pleasure.
In America, this dynamic plays out in various ways such as:
Media and Distraction: Reality TV, social media, and partisan news serve as modern-day bread and circuses. They keep people entertained and distracted, preventing deeper engagement with systemic problems.
Profiting from Struggle: From coverage of protests to depictions of poverty and crime, the suffering of marginalized communities is often commodified for ratings, clicks, and profit.
Normalization of Inequality: The glamorization of extreme wealth—juxtaposed with shows like Undercover Boss or Shark Tank—frames inequality as both aspirational and inevitable, distracting from systemic critiques.
Exploitation of Hope: Much like the players in Squid Game, the masses are lured by narratives of success against the odds. These stories maintain the myth that anyone can “win,” even as the system ensures that most cannot.
This spectacle not only distracts but also desensitizes. Just as Squid Game viewers (and even the players themselves) cheer for their favorite players while ignoring the brutality, we become complicit in a system that thrives on inequality, so long as it entertains.
#6.Voting as a Weapon of Division
Voting in both systems has been corrupted to the point of enslavement rather than liberation. In Squid Game, votes divide players, trapping the minority in a deadly system. In America, voting can similarly lead to polarized outcomes where a significant portion of the population feels trapped by decisions made by others whose conscious caculations and choices defy reality, reason, and facts, suggesting stupidity, insanity or criminality at play in their choices. This invites fear and widens scarcity of money and resources for all caught inside the system, and this perpetuates the disfunctional cycle.
Deeper Dive into Voting as a Weapon of Division
In Squid Game Season 2, voting is a deceptive tool. It gives players the illusion of control while dividing them into factions. After each game, just enough players vote to stay, forcing the rest to continue against their will. This creates tension, mistrust, and resentment, ensuring the group never unites against the true oppressors: the game’s creators.
In America, voting often functions in a similar way. While it’s framed as the cornerstone of democracy, systemic inequities undermine its fairness and effectiveness:
Gerrymandering and Suppression: Redistricting, voter ID laws, and reduced access to polling stations skew outcomes, ensuring minority voices often don’t carry equal weight.
Two-Party Entrapment: The binary nature of the system leaves many feeling forced to choose “the lesser of two evils,” which perpetuates disillusionment and apathy.
Polarization: Political and media systems capitalize on division, pitting groups against one another rather than addressing systemic issues. As in Squid Game, these divisions prevent collective action.
This creates a system where voting, rather than empowering, becomes a tool to trap citizens in a cycle of frustration, disillusionment, and inaction.
#7.Narrative of Hope
Investigate the way both systems dangle hope as a motivator. Squid Game players believe they can achieve a better life despite overwhelming odds. In America, the “American Dream” plays a similar role, motivating people to persevere despite systemic obstacles.
Deeper Dive Into the Narrative of Hope
Both Squid Game and modern democracies masterfully dangle hope as a motivator to keep people engaged in systems that exploit them, despite the overwhelming odds against meaningful success. This manipulation of hope creates a powerful psychological hook, ensuring participation while obscuring the deeper systemic issues at play. Let’s explore this in depth:
A. The Nature of Hope as a Motivator
1a. In Squid Game
The Promise of Escape: The cash prize, displayed tantalizingly above the players, represents the ultimate escape from debt, poverty, and desperation.
The Illusion of Agency: Players believe that if they “play smart” or “try harder,” they can achieve victory, even though the game’s design is rigged to ensure most fail.
Impact: Hope becomes a trap, as players cling to the dream of success while ignoring the moral compromises and physical dangers they endure.
2b. In Democracies
The Dream of Upward Mobility: Citizens are sold the idea of the “American Dream” (or similar narratives globally)—that hard work and determination can lead to success, regardless of starting circumstances.
The Illusion of Political Power: Elections and voting are presented as tools for change, yet systemic barriers (e.g., gerrymandering, voter suppression, lobbying) dilute the impact of individual voices.
Impact: Hope keeps people invested in systems that perpetuate inequality, with many blaming themselves rather than the system when success eludes them.
B. How Hope Is Dangled in Each System
1a. In Squid Game
Visualizing the Prize:
The giant glass piggy bank fills with money after every death, making the reward tangible and ever-present.
Psychological Impact: The constant reminder of the prize reinforces hope, even as the number of competitors—and odds of winning—dwindles.
False Choice to Leave:
Players are given the option to leave after the first game, which creates the illusion of freedom. However, the crushing realities of their external lives (debts, poverty) compel most to return.
Psychological Impact: This reinforces the belief that staying is their “best choice,” even though the system is inherently exploitative.
Individual Stories of Success:
The backstories of participants highlight personal struggles, making the prize seem like the only viable path to redemption.
Psychological Impact: Hope becomes deeply personal, tied to notions of worth and survival, which keeps players invested.
2b. In Democracies
Upward Mobility Narratives:
Success stories of individuals who “made it” despite humble beginnings are frequently highlighted in media and political discourse.
Psychological Impact: These stories perpetuate the belief that success is attainable for anyone, masking the systemic barriers that make such stories the exception, not the rule.
Electoral Promises:
Politicians campaign on lofty ideals and promises of systemic reform, often failing to deliver due to institutional constraints or lack of political will.
Psychological Impact: Citizens invest in hope every election cycle, believing “this time will be different,” only to face repeated disappointment.
Small Victories:
Incremental progress, such as raising the minimum wage or expanding healthcare, is celebrated as evidence of systemic change.
Psychological Impact: These victories, while meaningful, often obscure the broader structural inequalities that remain unaddressed.
C. The Double-Edged Sword of Hope
1a. Positive Motivator
Hope can inspire people to persevere and strive for change, even in the face of overwhelming odds.
In Squid Game: Some players exhibit extraordinary ingenuity and resilience, fueled by hope for a better future.
In Democracies: Grassroots movements and social justice campaigns often emerge from hope for systemic change.
2b. Tool of Control
However, hope can also be weaponized to maintain control and prevent rebellion.
In Squid Game: The dangling prize keeps players focused on survival rather than questioning the fairness of the system.
In Democracies: The belief that “change is possible” keeps citizens engaged in electoral systems, even when those systems fail to address root causes of inequality or injustice.
D. The Psychological Manipulation of Hope
1a. Hope as a Distraction
In Squid Game: Players focus on winning the prize, diverting attention from the inhumanity of the games themselves.
In Democracies: Citizens are encouraged to focus on individual success or incremental reforms, distracting from the need for systemic change.
2b. Fear of Losing Hope
In Squid Game: Players fear returning to their desperate lives without even trying for the prize, making them cling to hope despite the risks.
In Democracies: Citizens fear the loss of democratic institutions, even flawed ones, keeping them invested in systems that may not serve their best interests.
E. Breaking the Cycle: Reclaiming Authentic Hope
Recognizing the Illusions:
Both systems rely on manufactured hope to maintain control. Awareness of this manipulation is the first step toward reclaiming agency.
Building Solidarity:
Hope becomes transformative when shared collectively. Movements that emphasize community empowerment, such as mutual aid networks, create authentic hope rooted in collective action rather than individual competition.
Demanding Systemic Change:
Rather than clinging to the crumbs offered by these systems, pushing for systemic reforms—such as universal basic income, proportional representation, or campaign finance reform—can turn hope into a tool for genuine liberation.
HOPE Is Also the Most Powerful Four Letter Word
Here are stories and movements where hope became a force for systemic change, showing how collective action and a shared vision can break cycles of despair and lead to meaningful transformation. These examples illuminate the power of authentic hope rooted in solidarity, persistence, and community action.
1. The Civil Rights Movement (United States)
What Happened: During the mid-20th century, African Americans and allies fought against systemic racism, segregation, and voter suppression.
Why It’s Hopeful: Despite violent resistance, the movement achieved landmark victories like the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965). Leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. inspired hope by emphasizing justice and equality as attainable goals.
Key Lesson: Hope is sustained through collective struggle and the belief that systemic change is possible when people unite for a shared cause.
2. The Fall of Apartheid (South Africa)
What Happened: After decades of brutal racial segregation, the anti-apartheid movement, led by figures like Nelson Mandela, dismantled the apartheid regime through activism, international solidarity, and negotiations.
Why It’s Hopeful: Mandela’s vision of reconciliation over revenge turned what could have been a destructive transition into a hopeful one. His message that “It always seems impossible until it is done” galvanized millions.
Key Lesson: Hope can bridge divides, and even entrenched systems of oppression can fall when people refuse to accept the status quo.
3. The Women’s Suffrage Movement (Global)
What Happened: Across the globe, women fought for the right to vote, facing ridicule, imprisonment, and violence. In the U.S., this culminated in the 19th Amendment (1920), granting women the right to vote.
Why It’s Hopeful: This decades-long struggle, led by figures like Susan B. Anthony and Emmeline Pankhurst, showed how persistence and organizing could achieve systemic change.
Key Lesson: Hope fuels long-term battles for justice, proving that systemic barriers can be overcome through intergenerational activism.
4. The Indian Independence Movement
What Happened: India’s nonviolent struggle, led by Mahatma Gandhi, freed the nation from British colonial rule in 1947.
Why It’s Hopeful: The movement showed the power of peaceful resistance, with hope as a central theme in Gandhi’s philosophy of satyagraha (truth-force).
Key Lesson: Hope doesn’t require violence; it thrives on truth, resilience, and collective moral courage.
5. LGBTQ+ Rights & Marriage Equality
What Happened: Over decades, activists worked to decriminalize homosexuality, fight discrimination, and achieve marriage equality in many countries. Landmark victories include the U.S. Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. Hodges decision (2015).
Why It’s Hopeful: These achievements, driven by grassroots efforts and brave individuals, transformed societal attitudes and legal frameworks.
Key Lesson: Hope empowers marginalized communities to push for systemic change, even against entrenched prejudice.
6. Climate Action Movements (Global)
What Happened: Movements like Fridays for Future, led by Greta Thunberg, and Indigenous environmental activism have raised global awareness about the climate crisis and driven policy changes.
Why It’s Hopeful: Grassroots activism has forced governments and corporations to confront their environmental impact. The recent surge in renewable energy and sustainability efforts shows progress is possible.
Key Lesson: Hope motivates action, especially when urgency and community commitment converge.
7. Labor Movements & the Rise of Workers’ Rights
What Happened: The labor movement of the late 19th and early 20th centuries won rights like the 8-hour workday, workplace safety laws, and union protections.
Why It’s Hopeful: These victories arose from ordinary people organizing strikes, protests, and boycotts, demonstrating the power of collective action.
Key Lesson: Hope grows when individuals realize their collective strength can challenge even the most powerful systems.
8. Universal Healthcare Movements (Global)
What Happened: Countries like Canada, the UK, and many in Europe adopted universal healthcare systems after years of advocacy.
Why It’s Hopeful: These systems reduce inequality by ensuring that health is a right, not a privilege. Activists in the U.S. and other nations continue to push for similar reforms.
Key Lesson: Hope is sustained by the belief that essential human needs can be met through equitable systems.
9. Mutual Aid Networks
What Happened: In times of crisis—such as the COVID-19 pandemic or natural disasters—communities have organized mutual aid efforts, providing food, shelter, and care to those in need.
Why It’s Hopeful: These grassroots initiatives bypass broken systems to meet immediate needs, showing the power of solidarity and shared humanity.
Key Lesson: Hope thrives in local action, proving that communities can build resilience even when larger systems fail.
10. The Fight Against Authoritarianism
What Happened: Movements like those in Poland (Solidarity), Chile (against Pinochet), and more recently in Ukraine and Iran demonstrate resistance to authoritarian regimes.
Why It’s Hopeful: These struggles often succeed despite overwhelming odds, fueled by hope for freedom and self-determination.
Key Lesson: Hope becomes unstoppable when people unite to resist oppression, even in the darkest times.
Common Threads of Hope
Shared Vision: Hope grows when people unite around a common purpose.
Persistence: Transformative change often takes years or decades, but hope sustains the fight.
Collective Action: Movements grounded in solidarity harness the power of the many to overcome systemic challenges.
Leadership and Inspiration: Charismatic leaders and powerful stories galvanize hope and action.
These stories remind us that even the most oppressive systems can be challenged and changed when hope is transformed into action.
Speaking about stories…. have you read my book?
Stories are essential for how our minds work and how we use our precious gift of consciousness. If you read my book, you will understand why.
If you absolutely refuse to read my book, then read Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Series. He is talking about the exact same thing as the Sapience Series. I did not realize this when I began my series back in 2012, but having just started Asimov’s Foundation Series about one year ago and just finished his series just before the New Year, I know what he wrote about and what I write about are the same. Most of Asimov’s books are about this… I, Robot; Naked Sun; The Stars, Like Dust (I’m reading this one now), Pebble in the Sky, The Caves of Steel, or The Robots of Dawn.
Or pick up H.G. Wells, The Time Machine; Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End; Orson Scott Card, Ender’s Game; Dan Simmons, Hyperion; Frank Herbert, Dune; Larry Niven, Ringworld; Arthur C. Clarke, A Space Odyssey or Childhood’s End; James S. A. Corey, Leviathan Wakes; Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers; Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy; Iain Banks, Consider Phlebas.
The only way to get out of this Fucking Game that we are all being forced to play is to open our minds. This can only be done one person at a time…. and the very best way to do this is to learn… and the best way to learn is to read, travel, and talk to real people in real places and in real time, which is here and now!
Read… Read… Read!!
Also, please stop at Sapience’s shop: The Quip Collection. I am introducing compelling and chic Year of the Snake wearables as well as Zodiac and Valentines merch with much more to come. Without your time and attention, I will disappear.
On October 7, 2023, a significant and tragic escalation occurred in the ongoing conflict between Hamas and Israel. Early in the morning, Hamas launched a large-scale surprise attack on Israeli territory. The attack involved rocket fire and incursions by armed militants into various communities. This assault marked a particularly deadly day in the conflict’s history. It caused many casualties among both Israelis and Palestinians.
In response, Israel declared a state of war and commenced extensive military operations in Gaza. The violence quickly escalated, leading to airstrikes on Gaza and widespread destruction. The international community reacted with alarm, calling for de-escalation and urging both sides to pursue dialogue. The events of that day worsened the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. They also reignited discussions about the long-standing issues at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
As the anniversary approaches, reflections on the events and their aftermath emerge. They highlight the ongoing tensions. These tensions have a profound impact on civilians in the region.
In my book, Sapience: The Moment Is Now, I trace the roots of antisemitism back centuries. These hateful sentiments stretch back to the First Crusades and even further back in time. The night (or rather early morning) of the attack, I had a dream about the Human Cake. It was the second time I had dreamed this dream. It is not a pleasant dream. Rather, it is a shocking, revolting, scary dream, and I could not image why I was dreaming about it again.
In this dream, I see a team of doctors all wearing white coats. They enter a sterile white space where I and others wait. They enter this room through shiny white double doors. Behind these doors is the operating theater where they have been creating their new thing. It is this Thing that they are giving a press conference about. It is clear they are very pleased with their work. I can see their pride on their sly smiles. I can feel their arrogance in the way they push the Thing in a wheelchair for everyone to see.
They spare no gory details on how they created the atrocity sitting in the wheelchair. This Thing used to be a man. Now, it sits as a helpless creature in its wheelchair for it has no legs. Nor can it express any emotions because it no longer has a face. The doctors are proud of these aspects of the creature. They say it is a break through and discuss each step they took to get to this featureless creature.
Everyone in the room sits in stunned silence. There is nothing left of the man except a mound of gory goo. The doctors take turns describing with excitement how they systematically cut off every recognizable feature of the man. They describe with joy how they took these pieces and reattached them to utterly unsuitable places of the body. Places never intended for a severed limb or an eye.
The result is disgusting, stomach-churning, repulsive, beastly, vulgar, and heinous. The doctors did it, but the man volunteered. I couldn’t understand why?! Then, I woke up to the horrible news of what was happening in Israel. I was overwhelmed by the news coming out of Israel. And overhanging this was the shock and horror of my dream that lingered in my mind like an evil specter.
Carl Jung calls such moments as these Moments of Synchronicity. When any human encounters a moment of synchronicity, attention must be paid. This is because often, there is something very important for the individual to know or understand. I knew this was important.
I was working on the final stretch of my book feeling an intense need to get it published by 4/24/24. After October 7, 2023, I stopped writing and editing my book. I could not do a thing in it for the rest of the month. I felt compelled to witness the harrowing stories of survival. And I listened to the tragic stories of death of innocence people at the hands of men filled with hate.
I made a playlist on YouTube called Remember. I saved every story I heard to this list. I was shocked again and again at the savagery described by survivors. The brutality inflicted on babies, children, mothers, fathers, grandmothers, and grandfathers shook me to my core.
After this month of bearing witness, I knew what I had to do with my book. I needed to write about the Human Cake. And I also needed to include the history of the Middle East. This new research and writing sidelined me for at least another month, but I did it.
If you get my book, you will encounter the Human Cake first. He makes his appearance in the book at about page 101. Brothers of the Levant… Before the Fall begins on page 173. Histories of genocides begins around page 320 with the chapter titled: Rise of the Machine.
You need to read all of these sections to gain a full history of current crisis in the Middle East. You also need to read other sections to understand how hate has risen inside of man. He has learned to harness it with machine-like precision. I cover many, many hate groups who have emerged and are growing like a cancer all over the world. In addition, I carefully show how no human being is immune to the infection of hate. These sections are cited for I have researched them intensely. I cite historians, psychologists, and philosophers. Additionally, I reference people who have specialized and written about all this stuff for a very long time.
In this section, I talk about the Human Cake. My character Rain recalls her grandmother’s words about fear and other strong emotions. Her grandmother was a wise woman, and Rain knows she needs wisdom now to survive.
A man who clings to his instinct to kill becomes a person aroused by murder and death. It fascinates him like a candle flame, but to keep the kill candle burning… such a man must kill… constantly. But doing so in a civilized society risks punishment and possibly his own death. And so, such a man fantasizes about murder, mayhem, and massacres inside the confines of his mind. Such a man feeds his fantasies with pictures and images of dead or dying people; kill porn. Such a man glorifies death and idolizes martyrdom. Such a man celebrates the wholesale slaughter of other human beings who he considers to be less than he considers himself to be. It is a false and insincere division made by his foul and increasingly warp light of consciousness that must be constantly fed. He becomes like a drug addict who needs a hit of heroin to feel normal again.
Grandmother said that anything done constantly in the mind soon grows boring to man’s fickle, flickering light of conscious attention, so a man clinging to his kill instinct must up the ante to feed his fading fervor and desire to butcher and decimate other living beings. Such a man may pacify his erotic passion by killing what he considers lesser forms of life. He can also fuel the instinct to kill with anger, regret, and rage. He can work himself up into a berserker frenzy by consuming a steady diet of fury and indignation.
Grandmother said that a man who fantasizes about death and celebrates killing is the devil he fears in others. Such a man cultivates his inner instinct to kill to a fever-pitch, he becomes a tube of intensity, a cannula of desperate excitement, a pipeline of frantic, frenzied, futile fear and rage. His magma tube of hate drops him below the animal realm of living beings, it plunges him below the daemon realm of human beings. He falls into a monster pit, a place where he embodies the wretched vermin that he accuses others of being. His invisible world where all his thinking is done is transformed into Hell’s Kitchen populated by unrecognizable things baked in the heat of hate and scorn.
Such a man uses his laser beam of hate to mutilate his inner man. He disfigures and desecrates his inner self by cutting off his inner man’s fingers and toes, hands and feet, legs, and arms. He pulls out his inner man’s hair and gouges out his eyes. He removes his nose and mouth and face and slops them onto the growing heap of hate he is becoming. Then he turns up the heat of his fear and loathing, baking himself into a human cake made of hostility, disgust, resentment, bitterness, antipathy, and apathy.
Such a dismembered and disfigured inner man can no longer recognize the humanity in himself, and certainly not in others. He becomes a thing of contempt and repugnance, a thing no longer recognizable as human or animal, except for one thing: his thinking and his words. Such a man uses these lingering abilities with deft callousness to beguile and enthrall, to rivet and fascinate, to transfix, super charge, and magnetize the ordinary man and woman… pulling them farther and farther out of the mainstream, tempting them to leave their reservoirs of wisdom with promises of everything but love. Then he destroys their inner equanimity and binds them to him with chains of fear that are firmly fastened to his crumpled wheelchair of cruelty. He must do this for such a man is crippled by his own fear and hate. And so, he needs others to do the terrible things he dreams up, but which he is too cowardly to do himself.
Commanding his army of human zombies from his wheelchair of hate, he must constantly recruit new people to his wretched world of scorn and loathing because he throws his foot soldiers to their deaths again and again. And they must die because they have been commanded to kill the women, kill the children, kill the babies, kill the goats and chickens and dogs and wheat and barley and water… to kill anything resembling life. So, anything resembling life must fight back or be killed and die by the killer human zombies who have been robbed of their souls by the human cakes baked by their own hate.
Just before the Fall, some of the biggest, most hideous, gut-churning, ghastly acts of hate are immortalized as mere numbers: 9/11, 2/24, 10/7. Days of infamy that plunged the highly interconnected world of the dawning 21st Century not only into bloody, gruesome, localized conflicts and war, but mind grenades carefully calibrated to inspire fear and fill the ordinary man and woman with hate for the other around the entire world. It doesn’t matter what side a person is blown to in the blast of gruesome cruelty. These mind grenades are simply meant to shock and to shake the fragile foundations upon which modern people must trust will protect them and keep them safe.
With the ordinary man’s and woman’s trust in humanity shook, it doesn’t take much more for the most hateful human cakes to shatter any common bonds still holding a civilized society together into a million, billion bits. Once shattered, the hate filled human cakes rearrange the shiny, reflective shards of human consciousness like tiny mirrors on a disco ball. The human cakes shine their light of hate on the remnants of the ordinary man’s and woman’s sense of safety and security. -- Excerpt from Sapience: The Moment Is Now
What else can I say about hate of Human Cakes?
I can only show you the drawing I made of this creature… the one I dreamt about on the morning of October 7, 2023 for the second time. The dream I knew I needed to pay attention to… and so I did.
Conflict–what a terrible and yet beautiful word. Conflict is something all human beings must learn how to do from the moment they realize they are a different entity from their parents, primarily of course the mother. In psychology, this moment is known as thePrimal Split. In Judeo-Christian doctrines, it is known as Original Sin as epitomized in the opening chapters of the Book of Genesis telling how God created the world and all life in it and then created Adam and Eve to live in it and enjoy it.
But like any children, Adam and Eve inevitably disobey God’s command not to eat from the Tree of Knowledge; the one capable of inspiring inside of them the knowledge of good and evil. The conventional story tells that it is Eve who picked the tempting fruit after being deceived by a sneaky snake. But did you know Eve was Adam’s second wife?
Eve was Adam’s second wife. Adam had a secret first wife whom God created at the same time and in the same way as Adam. She was his equal and opposite in every way. Her name was Lilith. History mostly remembers her only as a demonic figure. One must look to medieval Jewish tradition to find where Lilith is remembered as Adam’s first wife, before Eve. However, when Adam insisted, she play a subservient role, Lilith grew wings and flew away.
I suspect what really happened in the Garden of Eden was entirely all too human. Upon getting his new beautiful, obedient but docile wife–certainly not his equal–Adam carried on an affair with Lilith. Eve never caught on, but God did. The only snake in this story is Adam’s manhood, and God was mad for his transgression for he created Eve for Adam on one condition to be faithful to her and Adam disobeyed. So, he had no choice but to throw Adam and Eve out of Eden. Lilith having transformed into a different sort of being, simply flew away.
The First Mortal Conflict
Conflict Styles: What Sciences Says — And how Liberating Structures can help create an environment where the most effective styles are possible. *** Medium blog by Christiaan Verwijs *** Most conflicts happen under the waterline. Illustration by Thea Schukken. *** You can also listen to this blogpost in this episode of our podcast.
So here we are: humans of the world left to find our way forward after the dramatic fall from Eden due to the first conflict of the world! A parent-child conflict, of course, just as the Primal Split is a primal parent-child conflict awakening the psyche to consciousness, but that is another story.
For this piece, I am sticking with the supernatural conflict between God the Father and his children, us. So super charged was this first mighty conflict, discord and strife remain the default mode of knowing in the world.
When conflict is done in an open, fluid, inquiring way, it can illuminate the world between us and inside of us, at least for a moment like a flicker from a spark caused by conflict. These sparks help us see more of what we don’t know about the world, about each other, or about ourselves. When we see the unknown, we can begin to know it. When we know it, we can integrate it into our Field of Consciousness (the part of ourselves illuminated by consciousness–i.e., what we know). This is how we grow our consciousness by seeing and learning more about the world around us and inside of us–most often through conflict.
But conflict can also cause us to get stuck within static, standing patterns of disagreement, disaccord, disharmony, and dissension. These patterns grow instead of consciousness. Over time, these patterns become rigid, unyielding, taut, stressed, tight, solid, and harden objects tend to collapse under pressure, trapping the individual’s desperately trying to sustain and defend them from attack. This becomes a crushing process, a dying process because locked into a standing pattern of permanent defensive conflict, the psyche does not grow and what does not grow in this realm, dies.
I will illuminate two talks I heard recently that were inspiring. I believe they offer opportunities of learning better ways to engage in conflict. This is important to learn because conflict is not going away anytime soon in the human world. So we might as well get better at doing it. I have imagined two common standing conflict patterns that all of us get caught in at one time or another. The first, I call getting Lost in the Garden of Eden. The second, I call getting Trapped in a Fairytale.
When we come together in relationships, we recreate a little bit of the Garden of Eden inside ourselves and inside of others. This little bit of Eden is a safe place to grow and learn about the world and ourselves. Of course learning means conflict because we are human now, but in relationship, we are in a place where we can be safely seen and heard for who we are–the good and the bad. This is love. Love is capable of holding the opposites of who we are in dynamic balance as we learn and grow through conflict and mistakes.
There is nothing bad about making mistakes or having conflict, except we can get stuck in bad patterns of conflict that hold us down in inferior patterns of behavior, second class beliefs, mediocre ideas, average/commonplace/uninspired ways of being in the world. This is how we get lost in Eden. We let our inferior self lead.
This leads me to the first talk I want to highlight. It is given by Esther Perel about how we can develop resilience in our relationships. I heard it on the Ted Radio Hour.
Esther Perel begins her talk saying, “People want to feel alive in their relationships. And they want it in their friendships, they want it at work, they want it in their romantic relationships. It’s essential.” Esther says this feeling of aliveness is what inspires us as human beings to build trust with each other, to collaborate or compete with each other, to build intimacy and maintain it through time.
One of the most powerful things about relationships is that they can help us weather uncertainty and survive against the odds. Esther says any “prolonged uncertainty …is accompanied with a sense of grief and loss, not because we lose people only but because we have lost the world that we knew.” She explains that she focused her work on working with couples because the couple inside the family really transformed. When marriage was a no-exit enterprise, then it didn’t really matter if the couple did that well or not. I mean, it mattered a great deal, but it didn’t matter for the survival of the family. People stayed together miserable if they had to. Once people could leave, the expectations and the demands from their intimate relationships completely changed. And I found that transition really fascinating.
Here are fascinating moments from Esther’s talk:
There’s Energy In the Room
“I realized that there was an energy in the room with a couple. You could actually see the change happening in front of you if you helped people to connect or to open up or to be vulnerable with each other or to speak truth to each other or to apologize to each other.”
We Think We Can Be Happier: But Really, We’re Just Walking Deeper & Getting More Lost in the Garden of Eden Inside Our Soul
“Today, we don’t leave because we are unhappy necessarily, but we also leave because we think we could be happier. And that is how consumerism has entered modern marriage.”
The Crisis of Desire is A Crisis of Imagination: We Need Each Other to Get Unlost in Eden
“I stumbled upon sexuality. It was absolutely not planned. And I stumbled about it, actually, around the Clinton scandal because what interested me was how sexuality in every society, in every culture becomes the place where the most archaic, traditional, rooted aspects of that culture are lodged or, on the other end, where the most progressive, radical, transformative changes take place.”
“So, we come to one person, and we basically are asking them to give us what once an entire village used to provide. Give me belonging. Give me identity. Give me continuity. But give me transcendence and mystery and awe all in one. Give me comfort. Give me edge. Give me novelty. Give me familiarity. Give me predictability. Give me surprise. And we think it’s a given, and toys and lingerie are going to save us with that.”
“…the crisis of desire is often a crisis of the imagination.”
“When I say that we cannot have one person give us what once an entire village used to provide, what I’m saying is that there is a kind of individualization in romantic love that I think is problematic. Look. At this moment, I’m not just even meeting a partner. We are meeting a soul mate. A soul mate used to be God; you know. But at this moment, people are talking about ecstasy, transcendence, meaning, wholeness, you know, things that we used to look for in the realm of the divine that have now been transcended into romantic love. It was meant to be. It’s almost a divine intervention. It fell from the heavens in front of me.”
“What I will say is that people need community, and they need other friends. They need other people to talk to. They need other people to share activities that their partner isn’t interested in. To ask one person to do all of that – to give me belonging, to give me meaning, to give me community, to give me transcendence, to give me – and then all the other stuff of everyday life – succession, children, family life, money, etc. – that is…”
Massive Transformation
“Relationships are undergoing massive transformation on all levels. But especially couples have gone through an extreme makeover. There is no other relationship that has gone through so much change.”
The following comment comes at the end of a segment where Esther and Manoush listen to part of a piece that aired on “Where Should We Begin?” dealing with infidelity… the most difficult type of conflict a couple can attempt to grapple with, especially because of the shame and failure our culture tends to attach to it. What Ester zeros in on is something I think all conflicts hold in common and that is coming to a better understanding of each person’s humanity and their individual journey that has brought them into the current conflict.
“And interestingly, when you reach the end of the session and you hear his – you know, his challenges around his feelings about masculinity, about the fact that he could not have a genetic connection to his children, about the way that, you know, he became the way he is not out of nothing. He becomes humanized. You may not like him, but you begin to understand him.”
For anyone playing at being an armchair therapist or just genuinely trying to be a friend and advise someone in a difficult conflict, what Ester says next is very important to remember.
“And that is the role of the therapist. The wife has to decide what she wants to do. And nobody lives with the consequences of her decisions but her. So, it’s very easy to tell people do this, do that. We are not in their seat. We help people gain clarity. We help people there to do the things that they are afraid to do if that’s what they say they want to do. But we also understand that this is a couple that has two decades together almost, that they have a rich life, that they actually often get along quite well and that…”
The Wonderful World Work & How the Bottom Line Accelerated Our Disorientation that Dumped Us on the Sea of Unconsciousness (Now We’re Really Lost in Eden)
Another fraught and difficult realm to navigate conflict is the workplace. Ester says, “When people go to work, you interview them about their official resume – what schools did they go to, what experience of work have they had? And nobody’s asking you about your unofficial resume, and your unofficial resume is your relationship history, and that relationship history does not stop at the door when you go into the office; it travels with you, and it is going to influence how you work with your colleagues or with your father or with your co-founder, etc.”
In a character from the Netflix miniseries OA, the young woman playing OA talks about the invisible self. It is the part of ourselves that we hide from others…sometimes hide even ourselves. But this invisible self is a reservoir holding all our potential selves. It holds our values, virtues, principles, ideals, and ethos–what the I Ching calls an individual’s superior qualities/Superior Self. It also holds our deceitful, empty, fruitless, idle, inconstant, ineffectual, nugatory, null, profitless, shadowy qualities/Inferior Self/Selves. It is hard to underscore just how important it is to illuminate more and become acquainted with all of who we are. It is the only way to truthfully, justly, compassionately navigate our fate, which is all those parts of ourselves still hidden in the darkness of the invisible self. We create Eden in relationship to each other. We get lost in Eden when we break our relationship to each other by letting the Inferior Self take control of our thoughts, decisions, and actions in the world we share together–this is how we create Hell.
The OA | We’re Angels | 1,061,667 views•Oct 25, 2017
Esther discusses how for years; it was very hard to get invited to companies to talk about relationships because it was considered a soft skill. It wasn’t part of the bottom line. And soft skills were often considered feminine skills, and feminine skills were often idealized in principle and disregarded in reality. She goes on to say this changed as transformations in workplaces changed and then suddenly, relationships become the new bottom line because no amount of free food or money…Compensation, benefits is going to compensate for a poisonous relationship. And then I began to think, you know, I would love to go and show how these relational dynamics that I have been exploring, they don’t just take place with your partner, your romantic partner; they actually are part of your relational life.”
A Bad Business Breakup
“I ask everybody, how many of you and your businesses have bad breakups? And to what extent do those breakups and in what way do these breakups influence the way you start to work with the next person and even who you hire? Often, we tend to hire the person whose strengths match the weaknesses of the one before you. I think work is a very rich ecology to explore the overt and the covert, the seen and the unseen relationship dynamics that people bring. We expected more in our personal relationships, but it happens no less at work.”
On a Time of Working from Home Using Too Much Zoom
“So, I would say I don’t think we are working from home, Manoush. I think we are working with home. I am with my family, my children for some of us, my partner for some of us, my parents, my siblings, my roommates. I am inhabiting all the roles at the same time. I am the parent, the teacher, the lover, the friend, the child of the colleague, the boss, the CEO, you name it. And it’s all happening often on the same chair in the kitchen.”
“So, we have all these disembodied experiences. And people talk about exhaustion for a reason – because even the phone is much better, you know, where we actually are in synchronized time and not in a delay constantly. And we’re not trying to look at people with whom we actually never make eye contact. So, I think it’s a very different reality.”
On Losing A Job
“And when I lose my job, I lose a fundamental part of my identity. I thought I mattered because a younger generation has been raised with a deep sense that they are important and that they matter. And I can – I am totally dispensable and nobody actually really feels responsible for making sure that I will have something to eat. I think what a pandemic does for work and for personal is it rearranges your priorities. It makes – you know, a pandemic is an accelerator. Every disaster is an accelerator of relationships. It’s an accelerator because it brings mortality to the forefront or loss – loss of job as well. And at that moment, you basically say, what am I waiting for? I’m going to go do what’s really important.”
Relationships rest at the center of who we are, who we want to be, how we become what we want to be, unless we get trapped in a standing pattern of conflict that can get us lost inside ourselves and in relationship with each other. Ask yourself what relationships are you in and what is their quality, vitality, fluidity, and spirit? Are they growing? Are you growing? If not, why not?
Trapped in a Fairytale
ABC’s Regina the Evil Queen of Once Upon a Time
Conflicts can rear up into ugly, unexpected things that tear relationships apart or trap them in stagnant, unchanging patterns that don’t allow for true growth. The trap may be beautiful where every wish is granted—a fairytale. Or the trap can be frightening and disorientating—another sort of fairytale. Both are dangerous because both end up separating you more and more from the hard work any real relationship requires to stay strong, supple, and grow through time.
If the separation grows too wide, too deep, a rupture of reality occurs. We do this all the time when we fail to heal the cracks caused by conflict, but rather focus on the cracks in another person’s story, ideas, beliefs. When we dissect and vivisect each other through constant unresolved conflict. When we fail to take responsibility for our part of the conflict. When we fail to hold the other in compassion and love and trust both people want to know the truth of who they are, who they are in relationship to each other, who they are in relationship to the world and universe. This is how we break reality into a million, billion, trillion pieces that just keep shattering more and more. This is how we create alternative realities, fairytales, where we may have control, but we don’t have knowledge… we don’t know anymore who we are, what we have become, or that we are trapped in a fairytale where we are the author, the characters, the victims, and the victor.
Once Upon A Time 1×21 “An Apple Red As Blood” – Regina Forces Snow White Ate The Poisoned Apple | 722 views•Nov 2, 2018
Whole groups of people can become locked inside fairytales, the boundaries of which are defined by one-sided arguments and lopsided beliefs. This is how human conflict becomes polarized. This is how radicalization forms and grows into a monstrous thing like a horrible fairytale.
Our modern lives are very complicated. Because of this, there are lots of conflicts… many, many of which go unresolved and fester. This is what I am calling getting trapped in a fairytale. The trap is inside our own mind and it causes us to lose sight of who we really are turning us into characters like the big bad wolf or Mary with her little lamb and making us ignorant of if we are eat the nourishing apple of the Tree of Knowledge or the poisonous apple brewed by the Evil Queen. The I Ching would say when this happens, one’s inferior selves have gained control are are trying to get rid of one’s superior self… the war is inside.
I really found Adam Grant’s talk with Shankar Vedantam on The Hidden Brain illuminating. I particularly found how Adam talked about two common types of human conflict:
Relational conflicts are inherently much more difficult to see clearly and navigate smoothly. I think every adult human being on Earth can cite a relational conflict that never was resolved and remains an open wound between both individuals involved. This is a tragedy always when a conflict cannot be resolved for it leaves an open wounded inside each individual’s mind that becomes inscribed within the growing consciousness—potentially causing it to grow lopsidedly, which will recreate the unresolved conflict over and over again with new individuals in desperate attempts to heal and continue conscious growth.
Task conflicts are very different actually essential for groups of people who have come together to solve a problem or to implement a collective effort. Task conflicts are how collectives grow the collective consciousness. However, if we are individuals who have not mastered relational conflicts, task conflicts are easily co-opted by an individual’s psyche and turned into a relational conflict, which serves to inhibit and sink the efforts of a group to grow and solve challenging problems.
Hidden Brain with Adam Grant – The Nice Guy –author of The Fool’s Journey
Shankar Vedantam introduces Adam Grant by saying, “Grant is an organizational psychologist at the Wharton School. He’s the author of Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know. He’s interested in the question of obstinacy. Why do so many of us find it difficult to question our own beliefs and challenge our own views?”
Adam begins his talk by recounting a conflict where he refused to admit he was wrong
“I think I was 12. My friend Khan was on the phone with me. It was a commercial during Seinfeld and we got into an argument. I don’t remember what it was about. And I just refused to give in, even though he had really good proof and eventually he hung up on me and I called him back and I said, did the power go out?”
On Competing Powers of Self
“And as long as I can remember, I’ve been agreeable. And it’s weird because on the one hand, I hated admitting I was wrong, and I was extremely stubborn. (…) But on the other hand, I really liked Harmony and I wanted to get along with other people.”
The Downside of Always Being Agreeable and Wanting Harmony
“Yeah, I think like everything else in life, it has tradeoffs. So, on the one hand, agreeable people create a lot of harmony. They tend to get along with other people. They’re constantly encouraging. But if you look at the data on leadership effectiveness, one of the things you see is highly agreeable people tend to be worse at leading organizations and teams than people who are somewhere in the middle of that spectrum. (…) They say yes to everything and they don’t challenge people enough.”
Agreement Bias
“…agreeable people are really prone to what’s called agreement bias.” Adam tells how this can be bad: “Cleverly. Where you come to the table, somebody offers you a terrible deal, but you hate the idea of saying no. And so, you say yes to something that’s not in your best interests.”
The Problem of Always Going with Your Gut
“I remember my mom telling me if you’re unsure of an answer on a test, go with your gut. Go with your first instinct. And yet, if you look at the research, if you do go with your gut versus your second guess your first instinct, which is better, and on average, the vast majority of students who reject their gut, they actually improve their scores on average.”
“And so, there’s a fallacy that your first thoughts are your best thoughts. A lot of times, intuition is just a subconscious pattern recognition. And the patterns that you’re recognizing from the past may not be relevant to the problem you’re solving right now in the present.”
I want to jump in here because we have lost so much knowledge of our inner realities our language and shared understanding about it has become muddled too. The confusion between instincts and intuition is one of these things. Instincts are short cuts to reality that help the individual survive dangerous and challenging circumstances. They are indeed triggered by pattern recognition that are recognized as dangerous, life threatening, or life promoting circumstances. Intuition is the ability gained by becoming a conscious being. It allows a conscious person to glimpse into the darkness of their unconsciousness and know something that would otherwise not be apparent or knowable. Repeated glimpses into the unconsciousness might recognizes patterns, but it takes conscious effort to unpack it and truly understand it. So, I would reword Adam’s second paragraph as instinct trying to navigate a world in which it never was evolved to live within… no wonder it gets multiple choice questions wrong!
Test Your Gut
“And so, you don’t want to trust your gut. You want to test your gut. And even when you tell people about this evidence, they are still reluctant to rethink their first answer…” like what happened with Blackberry “I think we can both remember a time when basically everyone you knew had a BlackBerry and they just dominated the market. And then BlackBerry fell apart because – Mike and his colleagues were unwilling to rethink the very things that had made BlackBerry great.” “And they just got locked into this set of assumptions that what people wanted out of a BlackBerry was a device for basically work e-mail, as opposed to essentially a computer in your pocket for home entertainment.”
Big Stakes Can Led to Big Mistake: The Importance of Rethinking What We Know
“Our reluctance to think again can have even bigger stakes in the 1980s, NASA downplayed a brewing problem in the spacecraft Challenger. Since the spacecraft had completed many missions, officials assumed it was safe. But in January 1986, the spacecraft exploded moments after liftoff, killing seven astronauts on board. […] Or take the U.S. war in Iraq, where President George W. Bush and his colleagues failed to rethink their views after their initial rosy expectations of the war.“
The Soup Nazi & the Drivers of Obstinacy
Shankar says, “Adam, I want to talk about some of the drivers of obstinacy in our lives. I know that you’re a fan of the TV show Seinfeld. And there’s a famous scene which features a restaurant owner who is called the Soup Nazi.”
Adam laughs as he explains what drives the Soup Nazi on Seinfeld, “He makes great soup, but he cannot tolerate the slightest criticism or deviation from the script. I want to play you a short clip where the character Elaine visits the Soup Nazi.”
The Soup Nazi | 1,914,009 views•Jul 22, 2017 | “NO soup for you!”
Task vs Relationship Conflicts
Shankar recaps, “So the Soup Nazi illustrates something that you talk about at home, the difference between relationship, conflict and Task conflict.”
Adam replies, “Most of us, especially those of us who are agreeable, when we think about conflict, we are thinking about Relationship conflict. That’s the personal, emotional, of us, especially those of us who are agreeable, when we think about conflict, we are thinking about Relationship conflict. That’s the personal, emotional, I think you’re a terrible person. And my life would be better if I never had to interact with you.”
[…]
“There’s another kind of conflict, though, that an organizational psychologist named Eddie Jan and her colleagues have studied. Task conflict, and it’s the idea of debating about different opinions and perspectives. It’s potentially constructive because it’s actually about trying to get to the truth. It’s not personal. It’s not emotional. We’re not trying to beat up the other person. We’re not feeling like we’re being attacked.”
How the Soup Nazi Inside Us All Turns Task Conflicts into Relationship Conflicts
“We’re trying to hash out or sought out different views through what might be a feisty conversation. But it’s intellectual. And I think one of the biggest problems that the Soup Nazi had is he could not have a task conflict without it becoming a relationship conflict.”
How the Soup Nazi Inside Us All Turns Task Conflicts into Relationship Conflicts
“We’re trying to hash out or sought out different views through what might be a feisty conversation. But it’s intellectual. And I think one of the biggest problems that the Soup Nazi had is he could not have a task conflict without it becoming a relationship conflict.”
“The moment that you object to his line, that you don’t follow his rules, he takes it very personally and bans you from his soup oasis.”
Less Conflict is Better: A Critical Mistake
“I think the mistake that a lot of people make is they assume that less conflict is better. That if you want to build a successful collaboration or a great team, then you want to minimize the amount of tension you have. But as some researchers have argued, based on a lot of evidence, the absence of conflict is not harmony, it’s apathy.”
How We Create Collectives of Apathy: Fairytales That Don’t End Happily Ever After
“If you’re in a group where people never disagree. The only way that could really happen is if people don’t care enough to speak their minds.[…] in order to get to wise decisions, creative solutions, we need to hear a variety of perspectives. We need diversity of thought. And task conflict is one of the ways that we get there by saying, you know what, I think we actually don’t agree on what the vision for our company should be or what our strategy should be or how to design this product.”
Adam’s Study on Groups
“I tracked team performance over a number of months, and I surveyed people in teams on how often they were having relationship conflict as well as task conflicts. In one group, even if they agreed on nothing else, they agreed on what kind of conflict they were having and how much of it.”
“It turned out in the failed groups, they tended to have a lot more relationship conflicts than task conflicts, especially early on, they were so busy disliking each other that they didn’t really have substantive debates until about halfway through the life cycle of their project.”
“And by then it was almost too late to change course, whereas in the high performing groups, they started out with very little relationship conflict and plenty of task conflict, saying, look, before we design a product, we really want to get all the ideas on the table about how we might do it or what it might be for. […] …once they sorted those out, they were able to really focus and align around what their common mission was.”
Where and How Things Go Wrong in Groups: Enter the Poison Apple or the Dragon
Adam says most often in a group, “Someone raises an issue with something that the group is doing, and people behave like the soup Nazi. They react and take things personally.” When this shift happens in a group, then “Everything that gets raised by the other person is interpreted in the most negative light possible. And then I think the other problem is people sometimes just they don’t even hear the substance of the idea because they’re so invested in defending their ego or in proving the other person wrong.”
But Wait… There’s More: Sometimes Conflict Arising Due to Confusion Over Beliefs & Values
Shankar says, “There’s a related idea to this distinction between task conflict and relationship conflict that you explore in your book. Adam, you say that one reason it’s hard to admit we are wrong is that we sometimes confuse our beliefs with our values.”
Belief or Value & the Dragon Scale
Adam says, “When I think about a belief, I would say that’s something that you take as true. A value is something you think is important. And yeah, I think a lot of us make a mistake of taking our beliefs and opinions and making them our identity. And since I spent a lot of time studying the workplace, I really enjoy thinking about how dangerous the world would be if people in the professions that we rely on every day did that.”
Conflicts That Clarify Rather Than Confuse
“There are examples of leaders who basically model what it’s like to have task conflict without relationship conflict. I was thinking of something that President Obama said some years ago when he invited someone, he disagreed with to play a prominent role in his administration.“
“We’re not going to agree on every single issue, but what we have to do is to be able to create an atmosphere where we can disagree without being disagreeable and then focus on those things that we hold in common as Americans.“
“To disagree without being disagreeable.”
On Correcting Others
Shankar recaps, “I think many of us forget this lesson at and we think that if someone else is wrong, our job is just to correct them. How we correct them is unimportant.”
Adam replies, “Yeah I think that’s such a common mistake in communication. We think it’s the message that matters. But so often whether somebody is willing to hear a message depends on who’s saying it, why it’s being said and how it’s being delivered.”
On Trust, Dignity & Respect
“I cannot tell you, Shankar, the number of times that I have rejected useful criticism because I didn’t trust the person who was giving it to me. Or they delivered it in a way that I found disrespectful or offensive.”
On Threats to the Ego: The Big Bad Wolf or Poison Apple Problem
“Not all of us listento useful feedback even when it’s presented clearly and without rancor. That’s because we confuse challenges to our views with threats to our ego.”
Or Maybe It’s Just a Case of the Totalitarian Ego
“There’s a term that I love for this which comes out of psychology originally Tony Greenwald’s term. It’s the totalitarian ego. The idea is that all of us have an inner dictator policing our thoughts. The dictator’s job is to keep out threatening information, much like Kim Jong Un would control the press in North Korea.”
Inner Dictator to the Rescue!
“When your core beliefs are attacked, the inner dictator comes in and rescues you with mental armor and, you know, activates confirmation bias where you only see what you expected to see all along, triggers desirability bias, where you only see what you wanted to see all along.”
Corner Stones of the Totalitarian Ego Are Obstinacy and Stubbornness
“You can see the totalitarian ego at work in a study conducted some years ago by researchers in Australia. They asked volunteers to think of a time when they did something wrong and apologized for it, and to also think about a time when they did something wrong and did not apologize for it. Researcher Tyler Okimoto explains what they found.”
Adam:When you refuse to apologize it actually makes you feel more empowered. That power and control seems to translate into greater feelings of self-worth. [00:24:41]
Shanker:And in some ways, the sounds like the inner dictator when we when we apologize, in some ways we are disarming ourselves. And when we refuse to apologize, in some ways we are mounting a form of emotional self-defense. [00:24:50]
Adam:Yeah sadly, staying attached to wrong convictions makes us feel strong. And psychologists have also found for decades that the act of resisting influence only further fortifies our convictions. Because we can we basically get inoculated against future attacks. We have all of our defenses ready and we end up sealing our beliefs in an ever more impenetrable fortress. [00:25:04]
Edges of Convictions, Beliefs, and Conflict: Maybe This Really Isn’t Your Fight… Your Just A Scale in the Armor of Your Group Who’s in Conflict with Another Group
“So, I have a brilliant colleague, Phil Tetlock, who wrote a paper about how almost every decision you’ve ever made, almost every opinion you’ve ever formed, is influenced by your relationship to the people around you and by the groups that your part of and the identities that you hold about who you are in the social world.”
Preacher, Prosecutor or Politician – Do You Know What Your Conflict Mode Is?
“What Phil observed is we often spend time thinking like preachers, prosecutors and politicians.”
The Preacher
“Preaching is basically defending a set of sacred beliefs and saying, look, I found the truth. My job is to proselytize.”
The Prosecutor
“Prosecuting is the reverse. This stance in a conflict is to prove you wrong and win my case with the best argument.”
Getting Stuck
“Any time an individual or group has strong beliefs. It’s pretty unlikely they are going to rethink any opinions or decisions if they slip into preacher or prosecutor mode, because we already know.”
The Politian
“We’re a little more flexible when we shift into politician mode. […] when you’re thinking like a politician, what you’re trying to do is get the approval of an audience that you care about.”
“And so, you might be campaigning and lobbying. And sometimes that means adjusting and flexing at least what you say you believe in order to fit in and win them over. The problem is that we’re doing it because we want to prove our allegiance to a tribe, not because we’re trying to get closer to the truth.”
Strategies that Help People Reconsider Cherished Opinions
Shanker asks Adam to tell the story of Orville and Wilbur Wright, the brothers who invented the first successful airplane. Adam describes:
“Of all the moments in history that I would love to witness, I think watching the Wright brothers argue would be pretty high on my list. So, if you look at the history of what the Wright brothers created together, it seemed like they were constantly in sync. They created their own printing press together. They ran their own bicycle shop. They made their own bikes together. They launched a newspaper together. And of course, we all know they invented the first at least successful airplane together. And I always assumed that they were just lucky to have such harmony.”
“And if you read any of the biographies that have been written about them, if you read their own letters and personal communications, if you read the stories and the anecdotes from people who knew them well, it was very clear that arguing was their default mode and it was almost the family business. What I think is fascinating about the Wright brothers is they mastered the ability to have productive task conflicts without it spilling into relationship conflict.”
It was typical for them when they were trying to invent their airplane to argue for weeks about questions like how do you design a propeller?
They would sometimes even shoot for hours back and forth.
At one point, their sister threatened to leave the house because she just couldn’t take it anymore.”
The Power of Scrapping
“But they seem to get a kick out of it. They called it scrapping and they said, look, the whole point of an argument is it helps both people see more clearly if you do it well.“
“They never saw an argument as personal that their mechanic used a phrase that I think about almost every day. He said, I don’t think they really got mad, but they sure got awfully hot. […] “That to me, captures the passion, the energy, the feistiness that goes into, you know, duking out a set of ideas that’s really important to you, but not leaving that interaction angry.”
Even Brilliant Visionaries Need a Team to Scrap With
“You tell the story of Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, obviously a brilliant visionary, but he was also famously stubborn.“
The Problem with Highly Agreeable People
“When you think about your network, we all have a support network that’s usually the highly agreeable people who we know are going to have our back and, you know, really lift us up or pick us up when we’re down. I think what we overlook is that we also need a challenge network, which is a group of people that we trust to question us to point out the holes in our thinking, the flaws in our logic, the ways that our decisions might be leading us astray from our goals.“
Creating a Great Challenge Network
“It’s not clear to me that Steve Jobs did this intentionally, but he was very lucky to be surrounded with a group of people who played that role of a challenge at work for him. […] He was dead set against making a phone. He complained for years about how smartphones were for the pocket protector crowd. And Apple makes cool products. We don’t want to touch that. He could rant for hours at a time about how, you know, everybody was beholden to the cell phone carriers and they didn’t know how to make an elegant product. And sometimes he would even throw his own phone against the wall and shatter it because he was so frustrated with how bad the technology was.”
Cultivating a Fertile Idea Field & Planting Idea Seeds that Grow
“Luckily, Jobs surrounded himself with brilliant engineers and designers who knew how to get him to think again. You have to be run by ideas, not hierarchy. A lot of the things they did as part of his Challenge Network are things that we’ve seen people do every day. They would plant seeds.
They would say, ‘Hey, I hear Microsoft is talking about making a phone. How ugly do you think that’s going to be? And if we ever made one of those, what would that look like?’”
They would ask questions like, you know, hey, we did the iPod. We’ve already put 20000 songs in your pocket.
What if we put everything in your pocket? And what they were doing was they were activating his curiosity.”
Taming the Inner Prosecutor: The Sneaky Little Gremlin in Any Good Fairytale
“If you told him he was wrong, he would immediately go into prosecutor mode and tear your argument apart.”
“But if you could ask a question that intrigued and led him to realize that he didn’t know some things, he might then go out and try to discover them or give you the green light to go and discover them. And those kinds of conversations finally got him to reverse course and make a phone.”
Madhvi Parekh: A Curious Seeker
Beware the Logic Bullies: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall — Enter Evil Spock
Adam tells how he got the nickname logic bully: “I had a former student named Jamie [who came to me] for some career advice. It was clear in the first minute or so of our conversation that she was already locked into the plan she had made. I was worried she might be making a decision that she would regret. So, I told her all the reasons why I think [she was] making a potentially big mistake. She listened patiently for two or three minutes, then said, ‘You’re a logical.’ She [told me] that I overwhelmed her with rational arguments and data, and she didn’t agree [with], but she didn’t feel like she could fight back.”
“The curiosity we show in trying to understand more about [our] own views and motivation to change [this type of] thinking. That’s where real thought happens.“
Habits of Highly Effective Thinkers
“There’s a classic study by Neil R. and colleagues [that examines] experts versus average negotiators where they compare what their habits are.
One is [average negotiators] spend a lot more time both in their planning and in their actual negotiations, thinking about common ground and talking about common ground, saying we want to build areas of consensus before we find out where we’re opposed.
They asked a lot more questions (e.g., OK here are two or three possible proposals. What are your reactions to this? What do you like? What do you dislike and what are your thoughts? And that allow them to both learn more and again, signal more flexibility as well.)“
Getting to the Great Ideas – Is It A War or A Dance?
Shanker summarizes: “We often think of trying to change someone’s opinion with the metaphor of, you know, a tug of war, that the harder I pull, the more I can get you off balance, the more likely I am to win. And the model that you’re suggesting here is a very different model, you know, model where you’re asking a lot of questions, where you’re seeking common ground, where you’re willing to make concessions, where you’re open to figuring out how you yourself might be wrong.”
Adam adds: “There are some psychologists who have said we should think about disagreements, less wars and more as a dance. And I can’t dance at all. […] But what I like about the dance metaphor is, you know, that in a dance your job is to get in sync with your partner.”
You Can’t Lead All the Time to Save the Planet!
“That means if you’ve both shown up to the dance with an idea about what steps you’re going to take; you can’t lead all the time and expect your partner to do all of the adjusting.“
“You actually have to be willing to step back and let your partner lead from time to time. And that’s what expert negotiators seem to do, its what great debaters seem to do, and I think it’s what all of us could do more when we have polarized conversations.”
I’ve taken you 40 minutes into this very beautiful and important talk, but there is more. You can read or listen for yourself if you have found any of this helpful. Adam and Shanker discuss how to frame multiple versions of an idea, setting up effective challenge networks, creating psychological safety to get to more and better creative ideas (idea places where people aren’t punished or penalized for offering opposite ideas), and creating group cultures based on trust and respect (critical part of psychological safety). Psychological safety does not mean sloppy:
[00:44:38] — Amy Edmondson is quick to point out that psychological safety is not about being nice or having low standards. We actually need psychological safety with accountability. We can have high expectations for people, but also give them the freedom and permission to rethink some of even what we might have called best practices.
They discuss creating environment where people are rewarded for being nuanced rather than punished. They talk about how to avoid becoming a group that is solution averse like what is happening with Climate Change.
[00:45:55] — “So, let’s say with climate change, for example, if you say, well, we need a whole bunch of companies to reduce their emissions and you’re talking to somebody who’s a staunch free market conservative, they’re not necessarily going to like that idea. And so, their motivation then is to deny the existence of the climate problem in the first place. And I think we should be really cautious about jumping to solutions. We would be better off saying, hey, I’m aware that there are some problems when it comes to climate change.”
[00:46:30] — “We shouldn’t spend all this time talking about why my solution is right or why your view that climate change isn’t an issue is wrong. Instead, I should say, well, given your views about what we should do on climate policy, how would your proposed solutions work and how would you implement them? And when you ask those questions, something really intriguing happens.
They talk about the invisible balance between idea flexibility and inflexibility (e.g., [00:48:15]
Winston Churchill facing down, you know, Adolf Hitler, even think of, you know, people like Mahatma Gandhi, you know, very singular, focused in terms of what they were doing, very unwilling to reconsider sort of the rightness of their views.)
They talk about explanatory depth, which is the idea that we think we understand complex systems much better than we actually do. They talk about the importance and benefits of being a little bit more intellectually humble, curious, nuanced, more doubting, and less dogmatic. These are the behaviors and habits that help people moderate their own views, become more patient with others, and become less extreme. In a time of extreme polarization on almost every conflict of existential crisis to human existence, isn’t learning how to become less extreme inside yourself a beautiful idea?!!!
Are you ready to rethink your cherished ideals and ideas today?
This tells about two women you stood in conflict against oppressive, lopsided, racists beliefs, behaviors, and practices. Because of their sacrifice and courage, our shared reality has been changed.
Description: When Billie Holiday was harassed by U.S. government agents and told to stop singing ‘Strange Fruit,’ she refused. When Shirley Chisholm ran for president and was ridiculed and told she shouldn’t aim that high politically, she refused. On this episode of Throughline, two pioneering Black women, Billie Holiday and Shirley Chisholm, who set their own sights and never backed down from a fight.
Sometimes conflict is essential to change the world and bend it back into balance.
“So much of the news from Syria consists of sad stories of chaos, of brutality, of war. But a new book — while a story about Syria and about war — brings us a refreshing story of hope, of female courage, and of heroes.“
Quantum Mechanics, Free Will and the Game of Life
Image from Scientific American | Credit: Getty Images
Excerpt: “Before I get to the serious stuff, a quick story about John Conway, a.k.a. the “mathematical magician.” I met him in 1993 in Princeton while working on “The Death of Proof.” When I poked my head into his office, Conway was sitting with his back to me staring at a computer. Hair tumbled down his back, his sagging pants exposed his ass-cleft. His office overflowed with books, journals, food wrappers and paper polyhedrons, many dangling from the ceiling. When I tentatively announced myself, he yelled without turning, What’s your birthday! Uh, June 23, I said. Year! Conway shouted. Year! 1953, I replied. After a split second he blurted out, Tuesday! He tapped his keyboard, stared at the screen and exulted, Yes! Finally facing me, Conway explained that he belongs to a group of people who calculate the day of the week of any date, past or present, as quickly as possible. He, Conway informed me with a manic grin, is one of the world’s fastest day-of-the-week calculators.”
There is so much we don’t know. An open, fluid, flexible mind able to navigate complexity and conflict with curiosity, passion, and compassion is beautiful. They world needs more beauty now. Are you ready?